SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1641

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Claimants – Appellant
Versus
Bhajan Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. claimants sought compensation under the motor vehicle act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. contention on income assessment and compensation inadequacy. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's observation on modifying compensation based on future prospects. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. judgment concluded with partial allowance of appeal. (Para 12)

1. This appeal has been preferred by the claimants under S.173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act of 1988') seeking enhancement of the award under appeal dated 17.8.2017 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mungeli (for short 'the Claims Tribunal') in Claim Case No. 11 of 2017, whereby the Tribunal has awarded a total amount of compensation to the tune of Rs. 7,22,200 with 9 per cent interest per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization. The parties to this appeal shall be referred hereinafter as per their description in the court below.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on 18.8.2016 at 3.15 p.m., deceased Sumendra alias Ramesh Singh Maravi was going along with his friend namely Dujram Dhruv from Litiya to village Changori and at the relevant time, they were dashed vehement












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top