Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Goutam Bhaduri, J
Mayank Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the factual basis of the appellant's eligibility and subsequent challenges. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court observations regarding university regulations and their application. (Para 7 , 12 , 19) |
| 3. arguments presented by both sides regarding the application of the bba ordinance. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. deliberation on the legality of academic decisions based on ordinance interpretation. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. final ruling reinstating eligibility and upholding compensation. (Para 24) |
1. Heard Mr. Sourabh Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Arjit Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Neeraj Choubey, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as well as Mr. Shobhit Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4.
2. This appeal is presented against the order dated 13.04.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (C) No. 146 of 2021, whereby, while not acceding to the prayers made by the writ petitioner, the learned Single Judge directed compensation of an amount of Rs. 15,000/- to be paid to him by Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University (for short, University).
3. The petitioner was enrolled as a student of Bachelor of Business Adm
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
