CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
, J
Akash Chandrakar and Another v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. need for victim notification in bail applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court highlights the importance of protecting victim rights. (Para 3 , 19) |
| 3. mandate for prior notice to victims in suspension of sentence hearings. (Para 20 , 22) |
1. The short question that has cropped up for consideration would be, whether for considering an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail under S.389(1) of the Cr.P.C., notice to the victim / complainant under the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ' the POCSO Act ' ) would be necessary as appellant No.1 has been convicted for offence under S.6 of the POCSO Act and appellant No.2 has been convicted for offence under S.6 read with S.17 of the POCSO Act in addition to their conviction for offences under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code.
2. In this appeal preferred under S.374(2) of the Cr.P.C., application for suspension of their substantive jail sentence has also been preferred by the appellants / accused for suspension of their sentences for offences under the provisions of the IPC as well as under the provisions of the POCSO Act.
3. Mr. Ashish Surana, learned Amicus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.