SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1684

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Sunil Kumar Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh


Table of Content
1. appellant's conviction described. (Para 1 , 2)
2. victim's rights under s.15-a analyzed. (Para 3 , 4 , 10 , 11)
3. supreme court's support for mandatory nature of s.15-a. (Para 5 , 6)
4. application of crpc and related considerations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. final order issued by the court. (Para 12)

1. The appellant herein has been convicted for offence punishable under S.302 of IPC and S.3(2)(v) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter ''Act of 1989'').

2. Since the matter is listed for hearing on the application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail as the appellant has also been convicted for offence under S.3(2)(v) of the Act of 1989, the question for consideration would be, whether the victim / dependent is required to be noticed and heard on I.A. No. 1, application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail ?

3. In order to answer the question, provisions contained under S.15 - A of the Act of 1989 which relates to rights of victims and witnesses may be referred herein. S.15 - A of the Act of 1989 contains important provisions that safeguards the rights of victims of caste - based atrocities and witnesses. Sub

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top