CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Anamika Parashar and Others v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. regulation of admissions in technical institutions under local laws. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. management quota admissions must adhere to merit-based criteria. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 36) |
| 3. inadequate show cause notice fails to meet legal standards. (Para 25 , 27) |
1. Heard Mr. Sanjay Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners in WPC Nos.1315 of 2015 and 1616 of 2015 and Mr. Kshitij Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners in WPC No.662 of 2016. Also heard Mr. Gagan Tiwari, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 in all the petitions and Mr. B. D. Guru, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.5 i.e. Institute of Technology, in all the petitions.
2. The facts presented in these petitions are that the Industries situated at Bilaspur and Korba had extended aid to the State Government and accordingly, the Industries were given quota for admission so that the children of the employees of these Industries can be admitted subject to their merit in Chhattisgarh Pre Engineering Test (CGPET) and All India Engineering Entrance Examination (AIEEE). The Institute of Technology is approved by All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE)
Gorkha Security Services v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.