Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
P. G. Agarwal, J
Sai Construction (M/s.) v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. obligations under tender notice and acceptance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. claims regarding communication and responsibility. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's consideration of facts and evidence. (Para 9 , 12) |
| 4. authority's decision-making is valid despite non-compliance. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. final ruling on petition denial. (Para 16 , 17) |
1. Heard Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the respondents.
2. The respondent No. 4 issued a Percentage Rate Basis Notice Inviting Tender (for short, the NIT) inviting bids for construction of Mangla Bhainsajhar Road to Dindayal Colony Lokhandi Railway Phatak two lane road, length of which is 3.52 km. The estimated cost was valued at Rs.517.12 lacs.
3. The petitioner, which is a registered 'A' category contractor, participated in the aforesaid NIT along with others. Bid was opened on 17.11.2021 and on such opening, the petitioner emerged as the 'L - 1' bidder. The respondent No. 2 issued an order of approval for issuance of Letter of Acceptance (LoA) on 03.12.2021 to the respondent No. 4.
4. The cause of action for approaching this Court b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
