Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
*Arup Kumar Goswami, C. J., Arvind Singh Chandel, J.
Rajendra Kumar Sao v. Mayank Dewangan
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments raised regarding seat conversion to unreserved category. (Para 1 , 8) |
| 2. petitioners sought registration for neet stray round. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court observes propriety of seat conversion. (Para 10) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed with no relief granted. (Para 11) |
1. Heard Mr. Vaibhav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Vikram Sharma, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Ms. Anubhuti Marhas, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 3, Ms. Anmol Sharma, learned Central Government counsel, appearing for respondent No. 4 and Mr. Malay Shrivastava, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 5.
2. The petitioners belong to 'OBC' category and they had appeared in the National Eligibility Cum Entrance Text (UG) - 2022 (NEET). The petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 had obtained 98 and 93 marks, respectively, in the said examination.
3. The admitted position is that the petitioners did not register for counselling. The mop - up round, after the first and second round of BDS course counselling, was concluded on 15.12.2022.
4. On 21.12.2022, the respondent No. 3 issued a notification for fresh registrati
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
