Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Rajkumar Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. firs for sexual exploitation based on familial ties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defense argument highlights property disputes as motive. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court observes improbability and delay in firs. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. parameters laid out for quashing under s.482. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. petitions allowed, firs quashed. (Para 13) |
1. CRMP No.1276/2022 has been preferred by petitioner - Rajkumar Chandrakar seeking to quash the entire charge - sheet and the proceedings emanating from it, pending before the learned Special Judge (Atrocities), Bilaspur in Sessions Case No.156/2022 which relates to Crime No.212/2022 registered at Police Station Seepat, District Bilaspur for offence under S.376 and S.506 of the IPC, whereas CRMP NO.1277/2022 has been preferred by petitioners - Rajkumar Chandrakar and his son Roshan Chandrakar seeking to quash the entire charge - sheet and the proceedings emanating from it, pending before the learned Special Judge (Atrocities), Bilaspur in Sessions Case No.155/2022 which relates to Crime No.210/2022 registered at Police Station Seepat, District Bilaspur for offence under S.376/34 of the IPC. Since in the present case, FIRs have been lodged by n
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
