SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Ramesh Kumar Mersa v. State of Chhattisgarh


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Aditi Singhvi
For the Respondents: Mr. Avinash Singh

Table of Content
1. conviction based on false certification by the applicant (Para 1 , 2 , 6)
2. arguments regarding lack of evidence vs. justification for conviction (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's reasoning on sentence modification (Para 5 , 8)
4. final sentencing decision (Para 9)

1. This criminal revision is directed against the impugned judgment dated 24-3-2011 passed by the Sessions Judge, Kabirdham (Kawardha) in Criminal Appeal No.4/2011 by which the learned Sessions Judge has confirmed the judgment dated 30-12-2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kawardha in Criminal Case No.386/2010 convicting the applicant herein for the offences punishable under S.420 read with S.34 and S.468 of the IPC and also confirmed the sentences awarded.

2. The applicant has been convicted for offences punishable under S.420 read with S.34 and S.468 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default, additional rigorous imprisonment for one month (four times) and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default, additional rigorous imprisonment for one month, respectively.

3. Ms. Aditi Singhvi, l







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top