CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Unnamed Judge, J
Shashank Sekhar Shaw v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants challenged rejection of discharge. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments on maintainability of writ petition. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's considerations on jurisdiction. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. art. 226's wide jurisdiction analysis. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. validity of rights enforceable under art.226. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. judicial orders do not violate fundamental rights. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. nature of art. 226 proceedings. (Para 17) |
| 8. judicial orders not amenable to art. 226. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 9. jurisdictional principles on judicial orders. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 10. framework for challenging charges framed. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 11. distinction between jurisdiction types. (Para 24) |
| 12. writ appeal dismissed as not maintainable. (Para 25) |
1. The two appellants herein (original writ petitioners) were charge - sheeted by the investigating authority before the jurisdictional criminal court for commission of offence under S.498A of the I PC on the complaint of respondent No.4 herein on which they applied for discharge from the aforesaid charge which the criminal court did not entertain and rejected the application for discharge from the said offence and further, framed charge for offence under S.498A of the I PC by
State of Haryana and others v. Bhaian Lal and others
Director of Settlements v. M.R. Appa Rao
Calcutta Gas Company (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of West Bengal and others
G. Bassi Reddy v. International Crops Research Institute
Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai
Radhey Shyam and another v. Chhabi Nath and Others
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited and another v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.