Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Ramesh Sinha, C. J., *Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
M/s. Kaushik Buildcon – Appellant
Versus
University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging tender decision based on experience. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner argues for consideration of partner experience. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. tender submission and qualification requirements. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. supreme court precedents on experience relevance. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's analysis on procedural fairness and judicial review. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. final ruling on the petition's dismissal. (Para 14) |
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition calling in question the impugned orders Annexures P - 3 and P - 4 by which the petitioner's technical bid was not opened holding that he is not having the requisite technical experience of work for tender Nos.70662 Saja and 70660 Kurud. The petitioner has further questioned the order Annexure! P - 16 by which the NIT dated 18-1-2021 has been cancelled by the respondent University.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that though the petitioner made representation for opening of its technical bid for the work in question, |but it was not considered and the technical bid was not opened nor informed and the tender in question has been arbitrarily cancelled by order dated 27-7-2021. It is the further case of the petitioner that exp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
