Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
, J
Banshilal Budhram Sahu v. Mohammad Javed Ahmad
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs' assertion of title through adverse possession was lacking substantial evidence. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 14) |
| 2. legal representatives presented arguments emphasizing the plaintiffs' failure to establish requisite conditions of adverse possession. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 3. court reiterated that adverse possession must be open, continuous, and with acknowledgment of the true owner's rights. (Para 19) |
| 4. if the plaintiffs can't prove continuous possession and knowledge by defendants, claim fails. (Para 21) |
1. The appellants / plaintiffs have filed this Second Appeal under S.100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the impugned judgment and decree dated 28-8-2017 passed in Civil Appeal No 34 - A / 2016 by the learned Additional District Judge, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (Annexure A / 1) arising out of judgment and decree dated 22-2-2010 passed by the Civil Judge, Class II, Nagari, District Dhamtari in Civil Suit No.34 - A / 2008 (Banshilal and others v. Mohammad Javed Ahmad and others) by which the learned trial Court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellants / plaintiffs.
2. The names of the parties have been described as per their description in the suit.
3. The f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
