SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10621

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Not mentioned, Not mentioned
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
J. C. Construction Company – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and context. (Para 1 , 2)
2. insurance company's counter-arguments. (Para 3 , 4)
3. lower court's award details. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. mandatory conciliation proceedings. (Para 10 , 11)
5. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)

1. This petition has been filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited questioning the legality and propriety of award dated 28.08.2012 (Annexure P - 1) passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility), Bastar, Place Jagdalpur in Case No.37/2012, whereby the claim made by the respondent No.3 - J. C. Construction Company under S.22(C) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1987") has been allowed while directing the Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs.24 Lakhs (Twenty four Lakh only) with interest @ 7.5 % per annum from the date of filing of the claim form dated 25.06.2007.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the claim enumerated under S.22(C) of the Act, 1987 has been made by the respondent No.3 before the Permanent Lok Adalat claiming compensation to the tune of Rs.24 Lakhs by submitting, inter alia, that the Poklane Machine bearing No. Tata

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top