Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Goutam Bhaduri, Sanjay K. Agrawal, JJ
Pamosushi Vijay Paramjyoti – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal appeals consolidated against ndps act convictions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. prosecution establishes case through evidence handling. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. appellants challenge legality of trial court's proceedings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court emphasizes critical procedural compliance for validity. (Para 11 , 12 , 15) |
| 5. court acquits appellants due to procedural failings. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
1. Since these aforesaid three criminal appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 27.04.2023 passed by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.), Raipur in Special Criminal Case No.22/2018, they are clubbed and heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. Appellants - Pamosushi Vijay Paramjyoti and Ravi Nadar have preferred Criminal Appeal No.1095 of 2023 under S.374(2) of the CrPC questioning the impugned judgment dated 27.04.2023 passed by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.), Raipur in Special Criminal Case No.22/2018, by which they have been convicted for offence under S.20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called as 'NDPS Act') and sentenced them undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 years and fine
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
