SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10628

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Goutam Bhaduri, Sanjay K. Agrawal, JJ
Pamosushi Vijay Paramjyoti – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.1095 of 2023 | Criminal Appeal No.1310/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Counsel Unnamed
For the Respondents: Mr. Marhas

Mandatory compliance with NDPS Act's provisions for seizure and evidence is essential; failure leads to invalidation of convictions.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20(b)(ii)

(C) - Conviction under NDPS Act for transporting ganja - The appellants were convicted and sentenced to 15 years with a fine of Rs.2,00,000/- - The court found that the prosecution failed to follow mandatory provisions concerning seizure, sampling, and inventory certification, thus vitiating the conviction. (Paras 17 and 21)

(B) Compliance of NDPS provisions - The court reinforced that mandatory compliance with S.52, S.52A, and S.55 of the NDPS Act is crucial, indicating that neglecting these protocols can lead to acquittal. (Paras 11 and 16)

(C) Acquittal due to insufficient evidence - The evidence produced did not definitively prove the offence due to flaws in procedural compliance, rendering the trial flawed and unjust. (Paras 16 and 20)

Table of Content
1. criminal appeals consolidated against ndps act convictions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. prosecution establishes case through evidence handling. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. appellants challenge legality of trial court's proceedings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. court emphasizes critical procedural compliance for validity. (Para 11 , 12 , 15)
5. court acquits appellants due to procedural failings. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

1. Since these aforesaid three criminal appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 27.04.2023 passed by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.), Raipur in Special Criminal Case No.22/2018, they are clubbed and heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Appellants - Pamosushi Vijay Paramjyoti and Ravi Nadar have preferred Criminal Appeal No.1095 of 2023 under S.374(2) of the CrPC questioning the impugned judgment dated 27.04.2023 passed by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.), Raipur in Special Criminal Case No.22/2018, by which they have been convicted for offence under S.20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called as 'NDPS Act') and sentenced them undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 years and fine of Rs.2,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 years.

3. Appellant - N. Shriniwas Rao has preferred Criminal Appeal No.1310/2022 under S.374(2) of the CrPC questioning the impugned judgment dated 27.04.2023 passed by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.), Raipur in Special Criminal Case No.22/2018, by which he has been convicted for offence under S.20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called as 'NDPS Act') and sentenced him undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 years and fine of Rs.2,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 years.

4. Appellant - V.V.R. Shrinivas Rao has preferred Criminal Appeal No.1310/2022 under S.374(2) of the CrPC questioning the impugned judgment dated 27.04.2023 passed by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.), Raipur in Special Criminal Case No.22/2018, by which he has been convicted for offence under S.20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called as 'NDPS Act') and sentenced him undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 years and fine of Rs.2,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 years.

5. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 10.02.2018 the head constable Balvant Yadav has received information through telephone that a white colour Ashok Leyland Vehicle bearing registration No. OD 30/2407 was transporting ganja from Andhra Pradesh and going to Uttar Pradesh via Dhamtari - Raipur. After receiving the information, the head constable has mentioned the said information in Rojnamcha Sanha No. 8 dated 10.02.2018 (Ex.P - 48). Thereafter, the said information was sent to SHO and recorded the Rojnamcha Sanha No. 9 (Ex.P - 49). The Crime Branch has also been informed to go for investigation of the said crime in Rojnamcha Sanha No. 10 (Ex.P - 50). The notice under S.160 CrPC (Ex.P - 5) was issued and Informer information Panchnama (Ex.P - 6) was prepared in presence of witnesses. After that the Investigating Officer along with staff and witnesses have departed to the spot and rojnamcha sanha No. 11 and 21 (Exs. P - 56 and P - 58) was recorded. Acting upon the information, the suspicious truck bearing registration No. OD 30/2407 has been stopped by the investigation team which has been mentioned in Rojnamcha Sahna No.20 (Ex. P - 57). The appellants were given notice under S.50 of NDPS Act informing about their rights and obtained their consent vide Exs.P - 4, P - 10, P - 1 and P - 11. Thereafter, the boxes in which fish were kept with ice are opened in which 8-8 packets of contraband were found and search Panchnama (Ex.P - 13) and seizure memo (Ex. P - 14) was prepared. Contraband was identified before the witnesses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top