Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Ramesh Sinha, C. J., Bibhu Datta Guru, J.
Rahul Chetiyar v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the case overview establishes the context and sequence of events leading to the appeal. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments highlight the appellant's claims of false implication and the prosecution's failure to allow for a dna test. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. the court's analysis affirms the victim's credibility and corroborative evidence justifying the conviction. (Para 7 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. the court’s final ruling upholds the trial court's conviction and sentence, rejecting the appeal. (Para 23 , 24) |
1. Heard Ms. Vikeshwari Jaya Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. R.K. Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent / State and Mr. Satyendra Srivas, learned counsel for the Objector.
This criminal appeal filed by the appellant under S.374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (for short, 'CrPC') is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27/07/2021, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge / Second Fast Track Special Court, District:Raipur (C.G.) in Special Criminal POCSO Case No.79/2018, whereby the appellant / accused has been convicted for the offence and sentenced as under: -
All the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
