2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10646
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
B.S. Vyas, J
Johan Lal Suryawanshi v. Chief Manager Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Raipur (C. G.)
Filing No.466/2022
The court outlined the application of limitation laws, emphasizing the exclusion of time due to pandemic regulations, allowing renewed consideration of the case.
Headnote:This judgment addresses the question of limitation concerning the filing of compensation claims under Section 2(j) of the Limitation Act. The deceased died due to electrocution on 24.06.2020, and the appellants filed their suit on 12.09.2022. The court determined that the trial court erred by dismissing the case based on the limitation period, as it did not correctly apply the Supreme Court's guidelines regarding the pandemic-related exclusion of time. The central issues include whether the suit was within the permissible time frame, based on the Supreme Court's orders pertaining to the Covid-19 pandemic. The court found the trial court's dismissal unsustainable and remitted the case for a fresh assessment. The appeal stands allowed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal details and incident leading to the suit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding time limitation and court fees. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on precedent and limitations. (Para 5 , 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding interpretations of the limitation in a pandemic. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. final conclusion allowing the appeal and remitting the case. (Para 12 , 13) |
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants / plaintiffs against the order dated 14.09.2022 passed by the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Janjgir, District Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) in Filing No.466/2022, whereby the suit of the plaintiffs has been dismissed as time barred. (The parties herein shall be referred as per their status before the Trial Court.)
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 12.09.2022, the appellants / plaintiffs filed suit claiming compensation to the tune of Rs.22,44,000/- from the respondents / defendants for the death of Ravi Suryawanshi occurred due to electrocution. The deceased Ravi Suryawanshi was working as Mason and on 24.06.2020 the deceased along with friend Mason Chaitram Suryawanshi went to Kulipota for mason work, where during work, the foot of deceased slipped and he fell in the transformer, due to which he suffered electric shock and he was taken to District Hospital, Janjgir, where he declared dead. At the time of accident, the deceased was aged about 26 years and he used to earn Rs.400/- per day. The learned Trial Court vide impugned order dated 14.09.2022 dismissed the case of the appellants on the ground of limitation, against which the present appeal has been filed.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the learned Trial Court has wrongly dismissed the suit of the appellants / plaintiffs on the ground of limitation. while filing suit, it was specifically mentioned that due to pandemic Covid - 19, the appropriate government had declared lockdown time to time. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has registered Suo - Motu Writ Petition (C) No.3 of 2020 and the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 has been excluded for counting limitation for filing suit, appeal, revision or any application before the courts and in the instant case, the deceased died during pandemic period on 24.06.2020, therefore the limitation is going to be counted from 28.02.2022 for filing suit and therefore the suit filed by the appellants / plaintiffs on 12.09 2022 is within limitation, as such the impugned order is illegal and against the provisions of the Limitation Act as well as guidelines of the Hon'ble Apex Court and this Court. Reliance has been placed on the order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court dated 10.01.2022 passed in Misc Application No.21/2022 in suo motu WPC No.3/2020 : AIROnLine 2022 SC 55, this Court's order dated 27.01.2022 passed in FA No.63/2021 in case of Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited v. Smt. Hemlata Netam, AIROnLine 2022 CHH 1012 and others, and order dated 24.01.2024 passed in FA No.151/2023 in case of Rameshwari and others v. Junior Assistant Engineer and others, AIROnLine 2024 CHH 246.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents strongly oppose the submission made by the appellants' counsel and jointly submit that the learned Trial Court has rightly dismissed the case of the appellants on the limitation ground. The deceased Ravi Suryavanshi died on 24.06.2020 and the limitation for filing the suit had already expired on 23.06.2021, whereas the Hon'ble Apex Court extended the limitation for 90 days after 01.03.2022 as such the limitation would have expired on 30.05.2022 therefore the suit of the plaintiffs is highly time barred, thus this appeal is without any merit and is liable to be dismissed. Learned counsel further submit that the suit was filed by the appellants for compensation of Rs.22.44 Lakhs so in this appeal ad valorem court fee is required to be paid as such this appeal is not maintainable without paying the requisite court fees.
5. Heard learned counsel for t