SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10658

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Judge Name, J
A B C Nil v. State of Chhattisgarh
Writ Petition No.398 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Ashish Tiwari
For the Respondents: State Counsel

The court affirmed that termination of pregnancy after 20 weeks for rape victims is permissible when mental and physical health risks are evident, prioritizing the victim’s best interests.

Headnote:(A) Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 - Sections 3 and 4 - Guidelines for termination of pregnancy in case of rape victims - Court must ascertain the medical and social circumstances faced by the victim to serve her best interests - Following the precedent set in related judgments, Court allows termination to prevent severe mental and physical harm. (Paras 8 to 17)

(B) Terminology and procedure - Importance of medical board reviews and compliance with legal norms for termination - Mental health and physical welfare prioritized.

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, a rape victim, seeks termination of 21-week pregnancy based on medical and psychological risks involved, supported by a Medical Board’s report and court procedure under the MTP Act. The petitioner filed the writ petition following the submission of medical reports indicating severe implications of continuing the pregnancy.

Findings of Court:
The court is satisfied with the Medical Board's finding that continuation poses a grave risk to the mental and physical health of the petitioner, allowing for the requested termination in accordance with established legal principles.

Issues: Key issues include the assessment of risks associated with the continuation of pregnancy, victim’s consent, and alignment with the guidelines from Supreme Court regarding reproductive rights in case of rape.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscores the primacy of the victim's best interests and the necessity to allow the abortion procedure under the MTP Act, reinforcing the precedent that pregnancies resultant from rape require careful, compassionate legal consideration.

Result: Petition Allowed.

Table of Content
1. urgent petition for medical termination of pregnancy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. the victim's legal standing and reported findings. (Para 4 , 5)
3. relevant provisions for pregnancy termination. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court's duty to prioritize victim's health. (Para 8 , 9)
5. precedents supporting patient autonomy in reproductive decisions. (Para 10 , 11)
6. judicial order needed for successful termination. (Para 12 , 16)
7. instructions for conducting the termination procedure. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)

1. On being urgency shown in the petition, the matter has been taken up in the winter holidays on 24.12.2024, and detailed medical report of the petitioner from the Medical Board, Bilaspur, constituted for the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (for short, "the Act of 1971") was called. After her examination, the Medical Board has submitted its report today itself, which is being taken on record, and then, this Court proceeds to decide the matter.

2. The petitioner, who is a victim of rape, and sexual violence, has preferred this writ petition on 23.12.2024 for termination of pregnancy, which, according to her, is a result of commission of offence of rape upon her, with the following prayer:

"This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased;

(a) To allow the Petitioner to terminate her ongoing pregnancy through registered medical practitioners at any approved private of Government center or Hospital before the completion of 24 weeks of pregnancy, and / or;

(b) To direct Respondent No. 4 to constitute a Medical Board of five well reputed doctors including the doctors from the Department of Obst. and Gynecology, Department of Neonatology and Department of Psychiatry to examine the petitioner (victim) physically and as well as psychologically to submit a feasibility report in terms of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 read with the Medical Termination of Pregnancy R.2003 along with determining the following:

(i) Whether carrying the pregnancy to the full term would impact upon the physical and mental well being of the Petitioner?

(ii) Whether termination of the pregnancy can be carried out at this stage without any threat to the life of the Petitioner?

(iii) Whether the age of the Petitioner would impact on the health condition of the Petitioner in case of medical termination of pregnancy?

(iv) Whether the petitioner and her parents are consenting the said procedure as explained by the Doctors with regards to medical termination of pregnancy?

(b) To facilitate the pre - operational and post operational procedure, medical expenses and medical care of the Petitioner.

(d) Pass any other order as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice of good conscience."

3. The petition was came up for hearing before this Court on 24.12.2024. On that day, this Court called a detailed report from the Medical Board constituted under the Act of 1971, and under the Notification dated 7th June, 2024, issued by the State Government, which consists of one Gynecologist, one Pediatrician, one Radiologist / Sonologist, and any other member, as required in the case, available in the hospital, to examine the petitioner. Examination report of the patient / petitioner with regard to her physical and mental state; Stage of pregnancy; Overall condition of foetus; How far the termination of pregnancy will be detrimental; How far it be detrimental, if the petitioner is allowed to complete full term of pregnancy; and Investigation report, and the report was directed to submit through the Collector, Bilaspur. The Collector, Bilaspur was also directed to ensure the compliance of order dated 24.12.2024, and to submit the report of Medical Board on 26.12.2024 before this Court. In compliance of that order, medical report of the petitioner has been submitted through the State counsel, which is taken on record.

4. Shri Ashish Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner, who is vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top