Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Smt. Amravati Devi – Appellant
Versus
Bedan Ram Since Died Through Lrs Smt. Subhgaria and Ors – Respondent
SA/334/2015
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 334 of 2015 Smt. Amravati Devi versus Bedan Ram Since Died Through Lrs Smt. Subhgaria and Ors Digitally signed by SHOAIB S A H N O W A A I R BA D N at W e: AR Order Sheet
2026.01.15 10:37:06 +0530
14/01/2026
Shri Aditya Diwan, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan Learned counsel for appellant. Shri Vikas Ghritlahre, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Shri Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent No. 7.
Heard on I.A. No. 04/2020, an application for withdrawal of Vakalatnama.
Learned counsel Shri Aditya Diwan, Advocate, appearing on behalf of Shri Vaibhav Goverdhan, Advocate, submits that the present application has been filed seeking withdrawal of the Vakalatnama. The application is supported by an affidavit of the appellant, wherein it is stated that she has engaged another counsel to represent her in the present appeal.
On due consideration, the application for withdrawal of Vakalatnama, i.e., I.A. No. 04/2020, is allowed.
Accordingly, the counsel who was appearing on behalf of the appellant by filing Vakalatnama dated 15.06.2015 stands discharged. It further appears from the record that Shri Sunil Sahu,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
