SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 448

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SATVIR SAINI – Appellant
Versus
JOGENDAR SINGH – Respondent
CONT/190/2021



2026:CGHC:2518

The date when the order is reserved The date when the order is pronounced The date when the order is uploaded on the website
Operative Full
16-10-2025 15-01-2026 - 15-01-2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Order reserved on : 16-10-2025 Order passed on : 15-01-2026 CONT CASE (C) No. 190 of 2021 Satvir Saini S/o Prem Singh Saini Aged About 49 Years R/o Tulsi Nagar, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh. Through His Wife Namely Anita Saini, Aged 45 Years, R/o Tulsi Nagar, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

... Petitioner versus

1 - Jogendar Singh S/o Late Mohan Singh R/o Rami Sagar Para, Darri Road, Ward No. 01, Korba Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh

2 - Germanjit Singh, S/o Jogendar Singh, R/o Rami Sagar Para, Darri Road, Ward No. 01, Korba Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh

3 - Suresh Sahu, Tahsildar, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

4 - Durgesh Sharma, Station House Officer, Kotwali, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

5 - Bunty Sharma, R/o Power House Road, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

6 - Mahendra Singh, R/o T.P. Nagar, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. RS Baghel, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr. RS Patel, Advocate.

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey, J

CAV Order

This petition arises out of the order dated 29.12.2020 passed by this Court in WP(227) No.524/2020 whereby the petitioner was granted interim protection against his eviction from the suit sop till the next date of hearing but respondent No.1 along with his associates flouted the said order.

02. Facts, in brief, of the case are that the petitioner filed a writ petition i.e. WP(227) No.524/2020 before this Court challenging the order dated 24.12.2020 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Korba in Case No.16/A-90/2018-19. On 29.12.2020 this Court issued notice to the respondents and granted interim protection to the petitioner, thereby staying the effect and operation of the order dated

24.12.2020 of the Rent Controlling Authority, Korba till the next date of hearing insofar as eviction of the petitioner from the suit shop alone is concerned. However, on the same day respondent No.1 along with 15- 20 persons came to the suit shop, abused and assaulted the son of the petitioner and threw the articles with the help of crane. Though the petitioner informed them about the interim order passed by this Court but they stated that they are not supposed to obey this order and torn the same. They also caught hold of his wife and one Preeti Sharma in an objectionable manner and dragged them. They complained of the said act of respondent No.1 and his associates to the police but no action was taken and after several requests, CSEB Chowki police took the wife and son of the petitioner for medical examination and suggested for x-ray. Thereafter, the police neither visited the spot nor lodged any report. Next day also respondent No.1 and his associates did not let the petitioner open the suit shop. On 1.1.2021 at about 6.30 am respondent No.1 and his associates broke open the lock and removed the heavy machinery installed in the suit shop with the help of Hydra machine. On intervention, they assaulted the petitioner and his children. Thereafter, instead of registering offence against them, the police took the petitioner and his children to police station and registered report against them. Though the petitioner, his wife and son submitted a detailed representation before the police authorities describing in detail the aforesaid incident and requested for taking suitable action against the wrongdoers but no action was taken by them. Hence this petition.

03. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that act of the respondents clearly amounts to willful disobedience of the order of this Court. On the date when interim order was passed by this Court, respondent No.1 with his associates came to the suit shop and by use of criminal force attempted to disposse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top