SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1238

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Mahendra Sponge And Power Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. – Respondent


NIRMALA RAO HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 275 of 2016 Mahendra Sponge And Power Ltd. versus South Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

09/02/2026 Shri Ashish Anand Bernard, Advocate alongwith Shri Ashish Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner/s.

Shri Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 3.

Heard on application for amendment of the writ petition.

The petitioner has filed this amendment application whereby a new clause 10(iv) has been added. By way of the said amendment, the petitioner has prayed for refund of the forfeited security deposit amounting to Rs.75,58,887/-, which was forfeited vide order dated

11.1.2016.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the fact with regard to forfeiture of the security deposit was specifically pleaded in para 9.8 of the writ petition. He would contend that due to inadvertence the petitioner could not make a specific prayer for refund of

respondents No.1 & 2. The petitioner shall carry out the necessary amendment within a period of seven days. The respondents would be at liberty to file an additional return, if so advised. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

Nimmi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top