SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1347

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SUNIL KUMAR NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
CRMP/2359/2025



2026:CGHC:6732-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2359 of 2025

1 - Sunil Kumar Naidu S/o Late P. J. Naidu Aged About 50 Years (Now 56 Years) R/o Vidya Nagar, Sector 2-3, Amlidih Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2 - Smt. Pollulu Sheela Naidu W/o Sunil Naidu Aged About 57 Years (Now 63 Years) R/o Vidya Nagar, Sector 2- 3, Amlidih Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ROHIT 3 - Archana Naidu W/o Shri Nitesh Naidu Aged About 31 Years (Now 37 KUMAR CHANDRA Years), R/o Ganga Nagar, Phase-II, Mangla Road, Bilaspur, District Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR Bilaspur Chhattisgarh CHANDRA

4 - Dheeraj Naidu S/o Sunil Kumar Naidu Aged About 33 Years (Now 39 Years), R/o House No. 21, Sector-2, Vidya Nagar Amlidih Raipur, Permanent Address House No. 23, Sector-2, Vidya Nagar Amlidih, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

5 - P. Ganga Naidu W/o Anil Kumar Naidu Aged About 51 Years (Now 57 Years), R/o Qtr. No. Type 2 P.A.T Colony, Bayron Bazar, P.S City Kotwali District Raipur Chhattisgarh

6 - Smt. P. Deepali @ Ritu Naidu D/o Anil Kumar Naidu Aged About 27 Years (Now 33 Years), R/o Qtr. No. 2-19, P.N.G. Colony, Bayron Bazar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

7 - Jaya Naidu W/o Dilip Naidu Aged About 51 Years (Now 57 Years), R/o House No. 19, Sector-2, Vidya Nagar, Amlidih, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus

1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station- Mahila Thana, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

2 - Vaishali Naidu W/o Dheeraj Naidu Aged About 33 Years R/o Canal Road, Amlidih, Near Garden, Rented House Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Presently Residing At Near Sahu Ata Chakki, Shree Nagar, Near Durga, Mandir, Khamtarai, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents _________________________________________________________

For Petitioners : Mr. Satya Prakash Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Lukesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate (through video conferencing)

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge

Order on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

06 .0 2 .202 6

1. Heard Mr. Satya Prakash Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for respondent No.1/State and Mr. Lukesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 2 through video conferencing.

2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers :

“I. Allow this petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S.

filed by the petitioners.

II. Quash the impugned FIR dated 29.11.2018 bearing Crime No. 48/2018 registered at Police Station, Mahila Thana, District-Raipur (C.G.) for the offence U/s

498-A, 294, 323, 506,34 of IPC against the petitioners.

III. Quash the impugned Final Report No. 41/2018 dated 24.12.2018 submitted by Police Station, Mahila Thana before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class. Raipur for the offence U/s 498-A, 294, 323, 506,34 of IPC against the petitioners. The copy of relevant part of challan is annexed as ANNEXURE P/1.

IV. Quash the impugned orders dated 22.06.2019 as well as the entire criminal proceedings pending in Criminal Case No. 8927/2018 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur for the offence U/s 498-A, 323, 506,34 of IPC against the petitioners.

V. Discharge the petitioners from the offence U/s 498-

A, 323, 506,34 of IPC.

VI. Grant any other relief, which may be deemed fit in given facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of petitioners.”

3. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage of petitioner No. 4 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized on 18.11.2016 at Shankar Nagar, Raipur and after marriage, the respondent No. 2 came in the house of petitioner No. 4 for performing matrimonial obligations. The petitioner No.1 is the father-in-law, petitioner No.2 is mother-in-law, petitioner No.3 is sister-in-law (living in her matrimonial house), petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top