IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
VISHAL GIRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/1221/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:6325
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 1221 of 2026
Vishal Giri S/o Shashi Giri Aged About 28 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Kirodimal
Nagar, Police Station, Kotraroad, District Raigarh (C.G.)
... Applicant
versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station, Kotraroad, District Raigarh (C.G.)
... Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Ravi Kumar Banjare, Advocate.
For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board
04.02.2026
1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant
who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 445/2025 registered
Digitally signed
by ABHISHEK
ABHISHEK SHRIVAS at Police Station – Kotra road, District Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence
SHRIVAS Date:
2026.02.05
12:55:58 +0530
punishable under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act.
2. As per the brief facts of the prosecution case, on 01.11.2025, on the
basis of secret information received by the police, it was alleged that the
present applicant along with another person was carrying a knife and
threatening people, thereby creating fear among the public. Acting upon
##PAGE2##2
the said information, the police apprehended the applicant and seized
one knife and a motorcycle from his possession. Thereafter, the police
registered an offence under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act against
the applicant and arrested him.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been
falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the
prosecution case itself shows that the applicant has not committed any
offence and that the police seized the said article from an open place, not
from the possession of the present applicant. He also submits that the
applicant has three criminal antecedents under the IPC; two cases have
already been disposed of and only one case is pending, the explanation
for which has been furnished in paragraph 4(a) of the present bail
application. It is further submitted that the applicant has been in judicial
custody since 01.11.2025. On these grounds, he prays for grant of
regular bail to the applicant.
4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application
and submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed before the
competent Court. He further submits that, in view of the criminal
antecedents of the applicant, which demonstrate that he is a habitual
offender, he is not entitled to the grant of regular bail.
5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the
case diary.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case,
namely that the applicant has three criminal antecedents under the IPC;
two cases have already been disposed of and only one case is pending,
the explanation for which has been furnished in paragraph 4(a) of the
present bail application and further considering that the charge-sheet has
##PAGE3##3
been filed before the competent Court and that the applicant has been in
judicial custody since 01.11.2025, and that the conclusion of the trial may
take some more time, this Court is of the considered view that the
applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the present case.
7. Let the Applicant – Vishal Giri, involved in Crime No. 445/2025
registered at Police Station – Kotra road, District Raigarh (C.G.) for the
offence punishable under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, be
released on bail on his furnishing personal bond with two sureties in
the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following
conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that
he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for
evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case
of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial
court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders
in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial
court on e