IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANDEEP LAXMAN BHOSLE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/1245/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:6323
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 1245 of 2026
Sandeep Laxman Bhosle S/o Shri Laxman Bhosle, Aged About 35 Years
R/o Village, Post And Police Station Chakan, District Pune (Maharashtra),
Present Address- Village- Chhati Police Station- Kurud, District Dhamtari
(C.G.)
... Applicant
versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Rajendra Nagar, District
Raipur C.G.
... Non-Applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Pragalbha Sharma, Advocate
For Non-Applicant/State : Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board
04.02.2026
1. This is the Second Bail Application filed under Section 483 of the
BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been
arrested in connection with Crime No. 379/2024, registered at
Police Station- Rajendra Nagar, District Raipur, (C.G.) for the
offence punishable under Sections 331(1), 305(a) and 3(5) of
Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
2. The earlier bail application of the applicant being MCRC No.
RAHUL
1903/2025 was rejected by this Court vide order dated 20.06.2025
DEWANGAN
Digitally
signed by on merits.
RAHUL
DEWANGAN
##PAGE2##2
3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 28.09.2024 at about
11:00 a.m., the parents of the complainant, namely Meera Pandey
and Shiv Narayan Pandey, left their house situated at Umashankar
Nagar, Ward No. 1, District Raipur, for Bilaspur after locking the
premises and handing over the keys to the complainant, Harshit
Pandey. When the complainant returned at about 3:00 p.m., he
found the lock of the main door broken and the almirah in his
mother’s bedroom forcibly opened, with articles lying scattered,
giving rise to suspicion of theft. Thereafter, upon the return of his
parents at about 8:00 p.m., it was confirmed that unknown persons
had committed theft of gold ornaments, including a mangalsutra,
ear tops, a nose ring and a ring weighing about 14 grams valued at
approximately Rs. 85,000/-, along with cash of about Rs. 11,000/-,
totalling Rs. 96,000/-. On the basis of the said incident, the FIR was
registered and the applicant was subsequently arrested.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that this is the second
bail application, earlier bail application of the applicant being MCRC
No. 1903/2025 was rejected by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated
20.06.2025 on merits. He further submits that the applicant has
been in jail since 25.10.2024 and has, therefore, undergone a
substantial period of incarceration of nearly one year and three
months by the time this bail application is being considered. It is
further submitted that the co-accused namely Sangat Singh Kalyani
has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated
13.10.2025 passed in MCRC No.5922/2025, and co-accused
namely Kiran Patil has also been granted bail by the Hon’ble Apex
##PAGE3##3
Court in SLP (Crl.) No. 12746/2025 vide order dated 03.11.2025.
and therefore, on the ground of parity, the present applicant also
deserves to be released on bail.
5. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail
application of the present applicant and submits that charge-sheet
has been filed before the competent Court, but could not dispute the
fact that co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this
Court as well as Hon’ble Apex Court and the case of the present
applicant is identical to that of the co-accused.
6. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused
the case diary.
7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case
that this is the applicant’s second bail application and that the
earlier application, MCRC No. 1903/2025 was rejected by this
Court vide order dated 20.06.2025 on merits, further considering
the fact that the applicant is in jail since 25.10.2024 and has thus
undergone a substantial period of incarceration of nearly one year
and three months, further the co-accused namely Sangat Singh
Kalyani has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated
13.10.2025 passed in MCRC No.5922/2025, and co-accused
namely
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.