IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
PARAKH BANJARE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRCA/103/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:6086
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
GOURI
MCRCA No. 103 of 2026
MUDALIAR
Parakh Banjare S/o Ghanaram Banjare Aged About 25 Years R/o
Digitally signed by
GOURI MUDALIAR
Date: 2026.02.04 Nipani, Tehsil And District - Balod, Chhattisgarh
15:04:14 +0530
...Applicant
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station -
Old Bhilai District - Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent
For Applicant : Shri Ishan Verma, Advocate.
For : Smt. Smriti Shrivastava, PL.
Respondent/State
For complainant : Shri Prabhat Saxena, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
Order on Board
03/02/2026
1. This first anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the
Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the
applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with
Crime No.338/2025 registered at Police Station – Old Bhilai
District - Durg, Chhattisgarh for the offences punishable under
##PAGE2##2
Section 67-A of IT ACT, 2000, Section 79 of BNS, 2023 and
Section 12 of POCSO Act, 2012.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that upon receipt of the
complaint, Police Station Old Bhilai conducted an enquiry, during
which it surfaced that an unknown person had created a fake
social media ID and through the said ID, uploaded photographs of
the complainant (mother of the minor victim) along with her minor
children and posted obscene, objectionable and sexually explicit
remarks, thereby lowering their dignity and exposing them to
public humiliation, pursuant to which an offence was initially
registered against the unknown person under Section 67 of the
Information Technology Act, 2000 and investigation was
commenced; thereafter, on an application submitted by the
Complainant on 29.10.2025 under Sections 173(4), 175(3) and
178 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, and learned
Court directed Police Station Old-Bhilai to register the offence and
submit the final report within two months, and in compliance
thereof Police Station Old Bhilai submitted Report No. 2506/25
dated 05.11.2025 stating that FIR No. 338/25 had already been
registered under Section 67(A) of the IT Act on the earlier
complaint of the mother of the complainant, and after vide order
dated 29.10.2025 learned Court directed addition of Section 79 of
the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 12 of the
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
##PAGE3##3
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the mother of the
complainant has been arrested in a case under Section 384 IPC
lodged by the applicant against the mother of the complainant.
Thereafter, it is stated that she has been granted bail. Hence in
retaliation, the present complaint has been filed by the
complainant just for harassment of the applicant, therefore, he
submits that the present applicant is entitled to be released on
anticipatory bail.
4. On the other hand, learned State counsel as also learned counsel
for the objector opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case
diary.
6. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, submission of
learned counsel for the parties, materials available on record,
further considering the fact that mother of the complainant was
arrested in a case under Section 384 IPC lodged by the present
applicant and was subsequently enlarged on bail, thereafter the
present complaint has been lodged, considering the fact, without
commenting anything on the merits of the case, I am inclined to
grant anticipatory bail to the present applicant.
7. Accordingly, the instant MCRCA is allowed and it is directed that
in the event of arrest of the applicant – Parakh Banjare, on
executing a personal bond and one surety in the like sum to the
##PAGE4##4
satisfaction of the arresting Officer, he shall be released on bail on
the following conditions:-
(a) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
dissu