##PAGE1##

1

2026:CGHC:6099

JYOTI NAFR

SHARMA

Digitally signed by

JYOTI SHARMA

Date: 2026.02.04 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

10:46:37 +0530

SA No. 21 of 2017

1. Lalmuni S/o Amir Singh, Aged About 45 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o

Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

2. Rajkishore S/o Amir Singh, Aged About 35 Years Caste Rautiya, R/o

Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Gulapi Singh W/o Late Jagdev Singh, Aged About 51 Years

Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District

Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

4. Smt. Bhagwati Singh D/o Late Jagdev Singh, Aged About 34 Years

W/o Virendra Kumar, Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli

Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh

5. Jayshanker Singh S/o Late Jagdev Singh, Aged About 32 Years

Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District

Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

6. Ku. Chandrakala D/o Late Jagdev Singh, Aged About 29 Years Caste

Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

7. Yashwant Singh S/o Late Jagdev Singh, Aged About 24 Years Caste

Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

8. Satyadev Singh S/o Late Jagdev Singh, Aged About 22 Years Caste

Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukutoli Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh

... Appellant(s)

versus

2

1. Sahaudra Bai D/o Gambhir Singh, Aged About 55 Years W/o

Banshidhar Singh, Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Chherdand Tukatoli Tahsil

Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

2. Saraswati D/o Gambhir Singh, Aged About 52 Years W/o Sardayal

Singh, Caste Rautiya, R/o Village Sendrimunda, Tahsil Duldula, District

Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

3. Sanmati D/o Tahlu, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Chherdand,

Tahsil Bagicha, Uptahsil Kansabel, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh,

District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

4. Mus. Lalita Bai Wd/o Ramnath Singh, Aged About 45 Years Caste

Rautiya, R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

5. Hukumchand Singh S/o Ramnath Singh, Aged About 22 Years Caste

Rautiya, R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

6. Makund Singh S/o Ramnath Singh, Aged About 20 Years Caste

Rautiya, R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

7. Shivnath Singh S/o Jaypal Singh, Aged About 40 Years Caste

Rautiya, R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

8. Uttam Singh S/o Jaypal Singh, Aged About 35 Years Caste Rautiya,

R/o Village Gattibuda, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh,

District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

9. Budhani D/o Tahlu, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Jammunda,

Tahsil Bagicha, Uptahsil Kansabel, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh,

District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

10. Kishun Ram S/o Loknath, Aged About 48 Years R/o Village

Bangurkela, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District :

Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

11. Damodar Ram S/o Loknath, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village

Bangurkela, Tahsil Duldula, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, District :

Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

12. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, District Jashpur,

Chhattisgarh ................Defendants, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

... Respondent(s)

For Appellant(s) : None

3

Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

Order on Board

03/02/2026

1. On repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the appellants to

prosecute the matter. Since no one is appearing, this Court is left

with no other option but to dismiss the case for want of

prosecution.

2. Accordingly, the present second appeal is dismissed for want of

pro