SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2392

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RINKEE YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
CRMP/438/2026



2026:CGHC:7481-DB NAFR D si i g g n it e a d l l b y y HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR BABLU BABLU RAJENDRA RAJENDRA BHANARKAR BHANARKAR Date:

2026.02.12

10:20:40 +0530 CRMP No. 438 of 2026 Rinkee Yadav W/o Rajesh Kumar Yadav Aged About 30 Years R/o Yadav Mohalla Azad Market Risali Police Station- Neavi, District- Durg (C.G.)

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station Supela Distt- Durg (C.G.)

2 - Sushant Prasanna Panda S/p Late Narendranath Panda Aged About 40 Years Posted As Law Officer Hinduja, Leyland Finance Pvt. Ltd. Nehru Nagar, P.S. Supela Distt- Durg (C.G.) R/o Behind Khursipar Police Station Bhilai P.S. Khursipar Distt- Durg (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Gagan Pandey, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, Deputy No.1-State Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge

Order on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

11.02.2026

1. Heard Mr.Gagan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for respondent No.1/State.

2. By way of this petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

“(1) Quash Supplementary Charge Sheet U/s 193 of B.N.S.S. bearing number 618-A/2025 dated 31.12.2025 filed against the petitioner in furtherance of Charge Sheet No. 618/2019 in F.I.R. No. 618/2019 registered at registered at Police Station Supela, Distt. Durg (C.G.) U/s 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 201 of Indian Penal Code (ANNEXURE P/1) and subsequent proceedings initiated thereon in relation to the petitioner herein, further, (2) Set aside of the cognizance order sheet dated 16.01.2026 (ANNEXURE P/2) passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Durg, District Durg in criminal case number 7638/2019 whereby the said court has taken cognizance in the matter pursuant Supplementary Charge Sheet U/s 193 of B.N.S.S. bearing number 618-A/2025 dated 31.12.2025 filed against the petitioner in furtherance of Charge Sheet No. 618/2019 in F.I.R. No. 618/2019 registered Police Station Supela, Distt. Durg (C.G.) U/s 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 201 of Indian Penal Code in relation to the petitioner herein;

(3) Pass any other order in view of the special facts and circumstances mentioned in the present petition, in the interest of justice.”

3. Brief facts of the case are that as per the F.I.R. lodged by the complainant/respondent No.2, namely Sushant Prasanna Panda, it is alleged that the husband of the petitioner and co-accused in the present crime, Rajesh Yadu, got two 14-wheel trucks (3718 A.L.) bearing registration Nos. CG 07 BN 2983 and CG 07 BN 2982 financed on 29.08.2018. The petitioner herein, Mrs. Rinki Yadav, wife of Rajesh Yadu, stood as guarantor for the said vehicles. It is alleged that after depositing the initial instalments of Rs. 1,40,000/- each for both trucks, Rajesh Yadu absconded with the vehicles from 02.01.2019 and failed to deposit the subsequent instalments.

4. It is further alleged in the F.I.R. that upon making inquiries, the complainant came to know from certain sources that Rajesh Yadu, along with his wife Rinki Yadav (petitioner herein) and his brother-in-law Ram Kumar Yadav, forged the chassis numbers and registration numbers of the said vehicles. It is alleged that truck bearing No. CG 07 BN 2983 was altered to registration No. CG 07 BQ 8231 and its original chassis No. MB1NACHD7JPDD5140 was changed to MB1NACHD9HPDY9364. Similarly, truck bearing No. CG 07 BN 2982 was allegedly altered to registration No. CG 07 BQ 8680 and its chassis No. MB1NACHD9JPDD5141 was changed to MB1NACHD9HPDY9375. It is further alleged that the vehicles were transferred in the name of co-accused Ram Kumar Yadav, son of Naresh Yadav.

5. It is also alleged that Rajesh Yadu, Rinki Yadav and Ram Kumar Yadav, in furtherance of a criminal conspiracy, got the vehicles refinanced from Shri Ram

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top