SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2443

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VERMA – Appellant
Versus
CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent
WPS/9660/2019



2026:CGHC:7629 ANKIT KUMAR NAFR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Date: 2026.02.12 16:02:57 +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9660 of 2019

Narendra Kumar Verma S/o Late Shiv Kumar Verma, Aged About 30 Years, Presently Posted In The Office Of Assistant Engineer, Bhatapara Zone, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Bhatapara, R/o Naya Ganj Ward, Kalyan Sagar, Near The Pond Bhatapara, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

... Petitioner versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Through Executive Director, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Bhatapara, District Balodabazar-

Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Lavkush Kumar Sahu, Advocate.

For Respondent :- Dr. Veena Nair, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. K.R. Nair, Advocate.

SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board

11.02.2026

1. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction against the Enquiry Officer to allow the petitioner to be posted at the original place of posting i.e. at Bhatapara.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the suspension of the petitioner was revoked and he was reinstated and posted at Distribution Center at Gopalpur, which is the other place than the place where he was posted at the time of suspension, therefore, respondents may be directed to post the petitioner at the same place i.e.

Bhatapara.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent would oppose the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considered their rival submissions made herein above and gone through the records with utmost circumspection.

5. Admittedly, the petitioner’s suspension has been revoked vide order dated 19.07.2019 and he is posted at new place i.e. Distribution Center at Gopalpur, as such, the petitioner’s grievance has already been redressed.

However, it is well settled that a Government servant can be shifted to new place after revocation of order of suspension which in accordance with law.

6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal)

Judge

Ankit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top