SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2551

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NILAMBER MANJHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPS/2082/2023



Digitally signed by NAFR SHAYNA KADRI HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2082 of 2023

1 - Nilamber Manjhi S/o Late Shri Nandlal Manjhi Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Lailunga, Ward No.- 5, High School Colony, P.S. And Tahsil Lailunga, District- Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2 - The Director, School Education Department Indrawati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3 - The Collector, Raigarh District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4 - The District Education Officer, Raigarh District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5 - The Block Education Officer, Lailunga District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Principal Government Boys Higher Secondary School Lailunga District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s)

(Cause-title is taken from Case Information System)

For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For State : Mr. Hrishikesh Sharma, Panel Lawyer SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

10/02/2026

1. The present writ petition is being filed seeking following reliefs:-

“10.1 That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the entire records in connection of the petitioner's cases.

10.2 That the Hon'ble court be further pleased to quash the impugned order dated 27.02.2023 (Ann.P/1) passed by the District Education Officer Raigarh rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment.

10.3 That the Hon'ble court be further pleased to direct the Respondent authority to consider and grant of compassionate appointment to the petitioner in the Respondent department as per rules within reasonable period.

10.4 Any other order that the Hon'ble Court deems fit and necessary in the circumstances of the case be also passed.

10.5 That the cost of the petition be also awarded to the petitioners”

2. Facts of the case, in brief, is that the petitioner, belonging to the Scheduled Tribe community and a permanent resident of Village Lailunga, Ward No. 5, High School Colony, Police Station and Tehsil Lailunga, District Raigarh, is duly registered with the employment exchange and possesses valid resident, caste and identity certificates issued by the competent authorities. He is adequately qualified, having passed High School (10+2) in the year 2004, Higher Secondary Examination in 2006, obtained a graduation degree in 2009, and thereafter acquired a Post Graduate Diploma in Computer Applications in the year 2015. The petitioner’s father, Late Shri Nand Lal Manjhi, was a regular employee under the respondent department and rendered unblemished service until his death in harness on 29.12.2016, which fact is duly supported by the death certificate and service certificate issued by the respondent authorities. Upon the demise of his father, the petitioner, being a dependent family member, submitted an application dated 15.02.2016 seeking compassionate appointment in accordance with the applicable government policy, along with all requisite documents. The petitioner’s family consists of his widowed mother, who is dependent upon him, his wife and children, as reflected in the ration card issued by the competent authority. Subsequently, the respondent authority, vide letter dated 09.05.2016, sought certain clarifications and additional documents, including an affidavit regarding employment status of family members, which were duly furnished. Despite the same, the petitioner’s case was not decided, compelling him to approach this Court by filing WPS No. 5190/2022, which was disposed of on 02.08.2022 with a direction to the respondents to consider his claim within a stipulated period. In compliance thereof, the petitioner again submitted a representation on 08.09.2022. During the pendency of consideration, the petitioner’s elder brother, who was residing separately, expired on 11.08.2022, and the same was duly intimated to the respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top