SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2632

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAJU DEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/1383/2026



2026:CGHC:7040 NAFR Digitally signed by VAISHALI VAISHALILUCKY LUCKY NAGARIA NAGARIA Date: HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

2026.02.10

17:36:02 +0530 MCRC No. 1383 of 2026 • Raju Dey S/o Late Sunil Dey Aged About 33 Years R/o Imliduggu, Korba, Thana Kotwali,district Korba (C.G.)

... Applicant versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through - Excise Circle, Korba (Shahar), District Korba (C.G.)

... Respondent (Cause title is taken from Case Information System)

For Applicant : Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

Order on Board

09.02.2026

1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section

483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 122/2025, registered at Police Station – Excise Circle, Korba (Shahar), District – Korba (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(1) (d)([k), 34(2) and 59(d) of C.G. Excise Act.

2. The case of the prosecution, is that the Police of Police Station –

Excise Circle, Korba District – Korba (C.G.) has received a secret information through the informant and on the basis of such information the Police has seized a total of 16.5 liters of Mahua liquor from the possession of the present applicant. Thereafter, the applicant has been arrested by the Police and the offence was registered.

3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and there four criminal antecedents under the Excise Act registered against the present applicant, out of which only one criminal case No.5136 of 2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District- Korba is pending for it’s conclusion. It is further submitted that the charge- sheet has been filed in this case. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. The applicant is in jail since 23.11.2025 and trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail.

4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that there are four criminal antecedents registered against the present applicant, and all are mentioned in the bail application and the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. It is further submitted that a total of 16.5 liters of hand made Mahua liquor has been seized from the possession of the present applicant, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that there is only one criminal antecedents under the Excise Act pending against the present applicant, charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant and he is in jail since 23.11.2025 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application.

7. Let applicant, Raju Dey, involved in Crime No. 122/2025, registered at Police Station – Excise Circle, Korba (Shahar), District – Korba (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(1) (d)([k), 34(2) and 59(d) of C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top