SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2672

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
DR. S. G. GHATGE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


2026:CGHC:7007-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1463 of 2024 Dr. S. G. Ghatge S/o Gajanand Rao Ghatge Aged About 79 Years R/o Ward No. 5 Balram Talkies Ke Pass Nehru Nagar, Police Station Civil Line District Bilaspur (C.G.)

... Petitioner versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Tarbahar, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

2 - Kishore Jambulkar Sanjay Nagar, Talapara, Police Station Civil Lines, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System)

For Petitioner : Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. S. S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge

Order on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

09 / 02/2026 VED 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for Respondent No. 2 submits that PRAKASH DEWANGAN although time was granted to file a reply, his client has not been VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN responding, and therefore the reply could not be filed. However, as Date: 2026.02.11 20:03:03 +0530 Respondent No. 2 is duly represented through his counsel, Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Advocate, service of notice u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top