SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2698

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
VIMAL KUMAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
SMT. RAJKUMARI YADAV – Respondent


2026:CGHC:6993-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 397 of 2025 • Vimal Kumar Yadav S/o Bhojram Yadav, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Urdana Naka, Ward No. 46, Police Station City Kotwali, Tahsil and Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

... Appellant versus • Smt. Rajkumari Yadav W/o Vimal Kumar Yadav Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Putpura, Sadak Para, P.S. Tahsil and Distt.

Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh. Mobile No. 7879798169 ... Respondent (Cause title taken from Case Information System)

For Appellant : Mr. Vipin Punjabi, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr. N.K. Chatterjee, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

09-02-2026

1. The present is the first appeal under Section 91(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 filed by the appellant against the impugned order dated 23-07-2025 passed by the learned Family Court Raigarh in Misc. Civil Case No.F-22/2024 whereby the application filed by the respondent under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil

DMAA iOg D iHt I a LAl MK y HMsi A gEN nDed by

D18a:t1e0: :23052 +6.00523.103 Procedure, 1908 (in short ‘the CPC’) was allowed and ex-parte

order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top