IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SHAHJAHAN KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC/147/2026
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:5599
Digitally
signed by NAFR
VAISHALI
VAISHALI LUCKY
LUCKY NAGARIA
NAGARIA Date:
2026.02.02
16:35:50 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
+0530
MCRC No. 147 of 2026
• Shahjahan Khan S/o Late Maksed Khan Aged About 49 Years R/o
Jagdevpur, Post D K Nagar, Harindaga, Thana Daimond Harbor,
District - South 24 Pargana, West Bengal
... Applicant
versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. Police Station - Kotwali
Sarangarh, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) Now.
... Respondent
(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)
For Applicant : Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, Advocate
For Respondent/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
Order on Board
31.01.2026
1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section
483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of
regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No.
124/2018, registered at Police Station – Kotwali Sarangarh, District –
Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections
403, 405, 415, 418, 420, 424, 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short
‘IPC’) and Section 6, 10 of CPDI Act, and Section 3,4, 5 of Prime Chit
Fund and Money Circulation Act, 1987.
2. The case of the prosecution, is that the complainant Hazari Ram was
##PAGE2##2
lured by the co-accused Jeetram Bhardwaj and Mahadeva Soni at his
home to invest in Kolkata Ware Industries Limited, promising him
good returns by promising to deposit Rs. 5 lakh, and to receive Rs.
10,000 in the form of shares and Rs. 6 lakh on July 5, 2012. On July
5, 2012, the complainant deposited Rs. 5 lakh with the branch
manager, Mahadeva Soni, at Garh Chowk Kesharwani Bhawan,
Sarangarh. He received Rs. 10,000 each in shares for 20 months. In
August 2013, the complainant again deposited Rs. 5 lakh at the
Dabhra branch of the company, receiving Rs. 10,000 each for six
months. Subsequently, the shares ceased to be distributed in March
2014, and the accused absconded. Following the complainant's
complaint to the police station, the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (SEBI), Kolkata, conducted an investigation and determined the
company to be a fraudulent company. Following the investigation, a
First Information Report (FIR) was filed against the co-accused
Jeetram Bharti and Mahadeva Soni at the Sarangarh police station.
Crime No. 124/2018, Sections 403, 405, 415, 418, 420, 424, 34 IPC
and Sections 6, 10 of C.G.P.D.I. Act and under sections 3, 4, 5 of the
Prime Chitfund and Money Circulation Act, 1987, the present
accused Shahjahan Khan has been arrested on dated 05.12.2025
and after investigation, charge sheet has been filed. Hence, this bail
application.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is
innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is
contended that the applicant has neither induced nor cheated the
complainant and has not received any amount from him in the name
of investment. It is further submitted that the applicant is not a
director of Kolkata Ware Industries Limited and no documentary
##PAGE3##3
evidence has been seized by the prosecution to establish his
involvement in the alleged offence. The implication of the applicant is
based solely on the memorandum statement of the co-accused, which
by itself has limited evidentiary value. Learned counsel further points
out that as per the FIR, the complainant last paid money in August
2013, and even after the alleged stoppage of share distribution in
March 2014, no complaint was lodged for a considerable period. It is
also submitted that the complainant did not name the present
applicant in the FIR. It is argued that the applicant has been in
judicial custody since 05.12.2025, the investigation is substantially
complete, and the trial is likely to take a long time for its conclusion.
On these grounds, bail has been prayed for.
4. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, opposes the bail
application and submits that the offence is serious in nature and
involves financi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.