IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MADHURI SAHU – Appellant
Versus
RAMBALI SAHU – Respondent
CRR/887/2024
##PAGE1##
1
GOURI
MUDALIAR
2026:CGHC:5530
Digitally signed by
GOURI MUDALIAR
Date: 2026.02.02
17:26:58 +0530 NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRR No. 887 of 2024
Madhuri Sahu W/o Shri Rambali Sahu Aged About 21 Years R/o Village
Bachhera Ps City Kotwali Mungeli Tahsil And District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.
... Applicant
versus
Rambali Sahu S/o Shri Jeevan Lal Sahu Aged About 25 Years R/o Village
Bachhera Ps City Kotwali Mungeli Tahsil And District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent
For Applicant : Shri Dheerendra Pandey, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
Order on Board
31/01/2026
1. Heard Shri Dheerendra Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the
applicant.
2. This Criminal Revision is filed being aggrieved by the order dated
05.07.2024, passed by learned Family Court, Mungeli, District Mungeli
(C.G.) in Misc. Criminal Case No.132/2023, whereby the learned
Family Court, rejected the application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C.
filed by the applicant.
##PAGE2##2
3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the applicant was married to the
non-applicant according to Hindu rites and customs on 23.04.2022.
The applicant alleges that after marriage, the non-applicant subjected
her to physical and mental cruelty on account of dowry demands and
ultimately drove her out of the matrimonial home in September 2022,
since when she has been residing at her parental home. The applicant
claims that the non-applicant is engaged in contracting work, earning
approximately Rs. 50,000/- per month, and is also the owner of five
acres of double-crop agricultural land, yielding substantial annual
income. On this basis, she sought maintenance of Rs. 25,000/- per
month under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The non-applicant admitted the fact
of marriage but denied all allegations of dowry demand and cruelty. He
contended that the applicant voluntarily left the matrimonial home,
refused to live with him, and is residing at her parental house of her
own free will. After considering the facts and evidence, learned trial
court passed the impugned order dated 05.07.2024 whereby dismissed
the application under section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by the applicant. Hence,
this revision.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned order
dated 05.07.2024, passed by the learned Family Court, is bad in law,
perverse, erroneous, illegal, and contrary to the evidence available on
record and therefore the same deserves to be set aside and
maintenance amount of Rs. 25,000/- per month be granted in favour of
the applicant. He would submit that the learned Family Court has
ignored the provisions of Section 125 of Cr.P.C., despite the fact that
the applicant is residing separately for sufficient and justified reasons.
He would submit that the learned family Court failed to consider that
##PAGE3##3
the respondent/non-applicant has not filed any application for
restitution of conjugal rights, which clearly shows that the respondent is
not interested in resuming cohabitation or maintaining a happy marital
life. He would submit that the learned Family Court ignored the salary
certificate filed by the applicant, which establishes that the
respondent/non-applicant is earning approximately Rs.50,000/- per
month. He would submit that the learned Family Court failed to
appreciate that it stands duly proved that the applicant is residing
separately for sufficient cause. The reply filed by the respondent/non-
applicant does not specifically deny the averments made in the
application, and the learned Family Court also failed to properly apply
the provisions of Section 125 Cr.P.C. while passing the impugned
order. He would submit that considering the income and financial
capacity of the respondent/husband, the applicant is entitled to a
reasonable and adequate amount of maintenance.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant, perused the pleadings
and documents appended thereto.
6. From the perusal of the impugned order, it transpires that the learned
Family Court has passed the impugned order dated 05/07/2024 after
due an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.