IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMESH PATEL – Appellant
Versus
NIRAKAR NAYAK – Respondent
CRMP/307/2026
##PAGE1##
1
Digitally signed
by SHUBHAM
SHUBHAM SINGH
SINGH RAGHUVANSHI
RAGHUVANSHI Date:
2026.01.31
17:37:12 +0530
2026:CGHC:5225
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 307 of 2026
Ramesh Patel S/o Paltan Patel Aged About 48 Years Caste-
Aghariya, R/o Village- Linjir, Police Station Baramkela And
District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh C.G.
... Petitioner
versus
Nirakar Nayak S/o Ghurau Nayak Aged About 38 Years Caste-
Aghariya, R/o Village Parsada (Chote), Police Station- Sarangarh,
District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh C.G., At Present R/o Tamnar,
Police Station And Tahsil Tamnar, District Raigarh C.G.
... Respondent
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Saraf, Advocate
For Respondent : Not noticed
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswa l
Order on Board
30.01.2026
1 Heard.
2
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under
Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 being aggrieved by the
##PAGE2##2
impugned order dated 09.12.2025 passed in Criminal
Appeal No. 12/2025 by the Learned Sessions Judge,
Gharghoda, District Raigarh (C.G.) whereby the learned
Sessions Court has imposed a condition of depositing 20%
of the compensation amount within 60 days while
suspending the execution of the judgment dated
10.11.2025 on an application preferred under Section 430
(1) of BNSS, 2023.
3
Brief facts of the case are that the respondent/complainant
filed a case under Section 138 of N.I. Act against the
petitioner and submitted that the petitioner was taken a
loan of Rs. 9,00,000/- from him and for the payment of the
said loan amount, one cheque amounting to Rs.
9,00,000/- was issued to him and upon production of the
said cheque the said cheque was dishonoured for
insufficient funds. The learned trial Court after taking into
consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and
evidence adduced in the case passed the judgment dated
10.11.2025 and convicted the present petitioner and
sentenced him to ungdergo rigorous imprisonment for 1
year and directed to pay compensation under Section
357(3) of Cr.P.C. of Rs. 9,00,000/- within the appeal
limitation period and for non deposition of the said amount
three months S.I. was ordered. Being aggrieved by the
order dated 10.11.2025 the petitioner preferred a Criminal
Appeal under Section 415 of BNSS, 2023 before the
Learned appellate Court along with an application under
Section 430 (1) of BNSS, 2023 for suspension of execution
of order dated 10.11.2025 which got allowed with a
condition that petitioner shall deposit 20% of the
##PAGE3##3
compensation amount within 60 days while suspending
the execution of the order dated 10.11.2025.
4
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the word
'may' has been used in Section 148 of the N.I. Act and the
Appellate Court has used discretion but has not given any
reason for the same. The learned appellate court has
committed grave error while passing the impugned order
dated 09.12.2025 and has wrongly imposed a condition of
depositing 20% of the compensation amount while
suspending the execution of order dated 10.11.2025. The
learned Appellate court has without following the
provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and
without considering the facts material available on record
passed the impugned order, hence it is liable to be
quashed.
5 Since the issue before this Court hinges upon the
interpretation of Section 148 of the N.I. Act, which was
subsequently incorporated to the N.I. Act vide the
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2018 (Act No. 20
of 2018), the relevant part thereof is reproduced
hereunder:-
1["148. Power of Appellate Court to order
payment pending appeal against conviction.-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), in
an appeal by the drawer against conviction under
section 138, the Appellate Court may order the
appellant to deposit such sum which shall be a
minimum of twenty per cent of the fine or
compensation awarded by the trial Court:
1 Inserted by Act No. 20 of 2018, w.e.f. 1-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.