##PAGE1##

1

2026:CGHC:5201

RUKHSAR

BANO

Digitally signed by

RUKHSAR BANO

Date: 2026.02.02

14:50:10 +0530 NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPC No. 346 of 2026

1 - Ankit Mishra S/o Ashok Mishra Aged About 37 Years R/o Rajkishore Nagar

Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.

... Petitioner

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster

Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Distt.- Raipur C.G.

2 - The Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, Distt- Bilaspur C.G.

3 - The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G.

4 - The Additional Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G.

5 - Tehsildar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G.

6 - Revenue Inspector Mopka, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G.

7 - Smt. Amita Devi W/o Laxmikant Dwivedi R/o Kapil Nagar Sarkanda Bilaspur,

Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.

8 - Smt. Manki Devi W/o Laxminarayana Sahu R/o Geetanjali City Bilaspur, Tehsil

And District Bilaspur C.G.

9 - Mahadev Bhattacharya S/o Satyanarayan Bhattacharya R/o Vaishali Nagar,

Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G.

10 - Mukesh Singh S/o Indranarayan Chandel R/o Rajkishor Nagar Bilaspur Tehsil

And District Bilaspur C.G.

... Respondents

(Cause title, as taken from CIS system)

For Petitioner : Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate

For State/Respondents No.1 to 6 : Mr. Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate

2

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

Order on Board

30/01/2026

1. Heard.

2. This writ petition (civil) has been preferred by petitioner under Article

226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:-

“10.1 Issue an appropriate writ, order, quashing

and setting aside the impugned notice dated

26.12.2025 issued by the learned Tahsildar,

whereby fresh demarcation has been initiated on

the application of the private respondents;

10.2 Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the

Respondent Authorities to conduct demarcation of

land bearing Khasra No 232/26 admeasuring 0.80

acre, strictly in pursuance of the remand order

dated 19.05.2025 passed by the learned

Additional Collector, and only on the basis of the

Petitioner's original application;

10.3 Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction

restraining the Respondent Authorities from

entertaining or acting upon any fresh or parallel

demarcation application filed by the private

respondents in respect of the said land;

10.4 Grant any other relief(s) deemed fit and

proper in the facts and circumstances of the case,

in the interest of justice;

10.5 Award costs of the present petition in favour

of the Petitioner.”

3. Pursuant to the query of this Court dated 28.01.2026, learned State

counsel submits that notices dated 26.12.2025 (Annexure -P/1 Colly.)

have been issued to the respondents No.7 to 10 and one Sangeeta

3

Vasnik for demarcation of their respective lands bearing Khasra Nos.

232/52, 232/48, 232/50, 232/49 and 232/51, respectively, to which, they

have filed separate applications. He further submits that the Additional

Tehsildar, Bilaspur, has also passed an order dated 08.09.2025 and

constituted a team of Patwari and Revenue Inspectors in compliance of

the order dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure -P/5) passed by the Additional

Collector, Bilaspur.

4. Having considered the aforesaid contention of learned State counsel,

and since the aforesaid notices issued to respondents No.7 to 10

pertain to the demarcation of their own lands, and the Additional

Tehsildar, Bilaspur has also passed an amended order dated

08.09.2025 in compliance with the order dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure -

P/5) passed by the Additional Collector, Bilaspur for demarcation of

land of petitioner, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in instant

petition. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this

petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondents No.4 and 5

to demarcate the petitioner’s land bearing Khasra No.232/26 along with

demarcation of land of the respondents No.7 to 10, as all the aforesaid

lands are adjacent to each other.

5. Learned State counsel has no objection to the