IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramkishun Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA/1119/2017
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:5299
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRA No. 1119 of 2017
Ramkishun Sahu S/o Jagdev Sahu, Aged About 32 Years R/o
Barbaspur, Police Station Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur,
Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Surajpur, District
Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Appellant : Mr. Shrikant Kaushik, Advocate
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Krishna Gopal Yadav, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma
Judgment on Board
30/01/2026
1. This criminal appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of
Cr.P.C., 1973 by the appellant against the judgment of conviction
and order of sentence dated 04.07.2017 passed by the learned
Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Surajpur, District- Surajpur (C.G.), in
##PAGE2##2
NDPS CNR No. CGSJ010002352016, whereby the appellant has
been convicted and sentenced as follows:-
Convicted Sentenced to
U/s 20(b)(ii)(B) of R.I. for 5 years with fine of Rs.
N.D.P.S. Act, 1985 20,000/-, in default of payment of fine,
additional R.I. for 6 months.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 07.03.2016, while on pa-
trol duty, the police received secret information that a person was
transporting ganja on a motorcycle for sale. Acting on the informa-
tion, the police team reached the spot, intercepted the suspect,
and conducted a search after completing legal formalities and ob-
taining consent. Two packets of ganja weighing about 2 kilograms
in total were recovered from the motorcycle. The contraband was
seized, samples were drawn and sealed, and all necessary
panchnamas were prepared. The accused was arrested in accor-
dance with law. The seized samples were sent to the Forensic
Science Laboratory, which confirmed the substance to be ganja.
After completion of investigation, sufficient evidence was found,
and a charge-sheet was filed against the accused under Section
20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act.
3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Surajpur, District- Sura-
jpur (C.G.), after appreciating oral and documentary evidence
available on record vide judgment dated 04.07.2017, convicted
the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(B)
##PAGE3##3
of the N.D.P.S. and sentenced him as mentioned in opening para-
graph of this order.
4. The appellant was in jail from 07.03.2016 to 20.06.2016 (106
days) during trial then he was in jail from the date of judgment
dated 04.07.2017 to 17.05.2018 (318 days), in total (424 days).
5. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the appellant
is innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the afore-
said case and the mandatory provisions have not been followed
by the prosecution. The judgment of the Trial Court is bad in law
as well as on facts. The learned Trial Court ought not to have con-
victed and sentenced the appellant and ought to have given the
benefit of doubt since the evidence submitted by the prosecution
is very shaky and unbelievable. The Trial Court failed to appreci-
ate the evidence and documents available on record.
6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not want
to press this appeal on merits and confine his arguments to the
sentence part thereof only. Further, he submits that the appellant
at present is aged about 40 years and as he is facing criminal trial
since 2016 and the appellant has already undergone 424 days of
the sentence awarded by the trial Court. There is also no previous
criminal antecedents against the appellant. Therefore, the jail sen-
tence awarded to the appellant may be reduced to the period al-
ready undergone by him.
##PAGE4##4
7. Learned Panel Laywer appearing for the respondent/State, sub-
mits that the Trial Court has rightly convicted and sentenced the
appellant, in which no interference is called for.
8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, considered their rival
submissions made hereinabove and also went through the records
with utmost circumspection.
9. From perusal of the records, it transpires that on 07.03.2016,
while on patro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.