SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 3468

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
PARMESHWARI SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPS/8150/2022



##PAGE1##

1

2026:CGHC:4759

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPS No. 8150 of 2022

1 - Parmeshwari Sahu D/o Mohan Lal Sahu Aged About 40 Years R/o Adarsh Nagar,

Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya,

Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2 - Director Directorate, Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur,

District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3 - Collector-Cum-President Swami Atmanand Utkrisht English Medium School, Sanchalan

Evam Prabandhan Samiti, Durg, In Front Of Zila Panchayat, G.E. Road, Durg, District Durg,

Chhattisgarh

4 - District Education Officer Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. J. K. Rao, Advocate

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, P. L.

(Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput)

Order on Board

28/01/2026

1. Following relief has been claimed in this writ petition:-

10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent

authorities to prepared the merit list/eligibility list on the basis of the marks of

minimum qualification.

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent

authorities to consider the petitioner for the post of Physical Teacher (English

Medium).

##PAGE2##

2

10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief as it may

deems fit and appropriate.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an advertisement dated 22.07.2022

was published by the respondent No.3, inviting applications for various posts,

including that of Physical Teacher in Swami Atmanand Excellence English Medium

School, District Durg. As per the terms of the advertisement, the marks would be

considered that 70% marks for minimum educational qualification, 5 marks for

experience, 15 marks for teaching skills and 10 marks for the interview and on that

basis merit list would be prepared. He further submits that the prescribed minimum

qualification for appointment to the post of Physical Teacher is Higher Secondary

pass along with D.P. Ed. or B. P. Ed. with graduation. He further submits that the

respondents were supposed to adhere to the procedure prescribed for granting the

marks as per minimum qualification as prescribed in the advertisement, however a

provisional merit list was prepared in which the methodology given in the

advertisement has been given a go-by and the marks obtained in B. P. Ed. / D. P. Ed.

were not taken into consideration; instead, only the marks obtained in Higher

Secondary examination and graduation were taken into consideration. Thus, this writ

petition was filed seeking for the above stated relief. He further submits that similar

advertisements were issued in different districts and the marks obtained in B. P. Ed/

D. P. Ed have been considered.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the preparation of the provisional

merit list (Annexure P-2) is strictly adheres to the procedure prescribed in the

advertisement. He further submits that the writ petition is premature at this stage. As

only a provisional list for the post of Physical Teacher has been prepared, the

petitioner has all the rights to challenge the legality of the merit list so prepared. If

the petitioner make any objection regarding the provisional merit list so prepared,

that would be dealt with and decided in an objective manner.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

##PAGE3##

3

5. This Court, vide order dated 01.12.2022 directed that the selection process may

proceed, however, no appointment orders were to be issued until the next date of

hearing. This interim order is still in force. At this stage, this Court is inclined to

dispose of the writ petition by permitting the petitioner to make objections/

representation against the provisional merit list prepared for the post of physical

teacher to the concerned respondents within a period of 30 days from the date of

rece

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top