Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Narendra Kumar Vyas, CAV
Vasudeo Gond – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. observations regarding evidence and legal interpretations. (Para 1 , 15 , 17 , 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 2. key facts holding the basis for the conviction. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. arguments presented by appellant's counsel against the conviction. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. judgment clarifying conviction modifications. (Para 16 , 18) |
| 5. final decision and direction of the appeal. (Para 24 , 26) |
CAV JUDGMENT
1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 against judgment dated 06.04.2005 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhamtari, Camp- Raipur (C.G.) in Sessions Trial No. 217/2004, whereby the appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under:-
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 21.05.2004, the victim was alone in her house and at that time, the accused came there and asked her whether she would go to shop and when the victim asked him for money to go to the shop, the appellant caught hold her hand, forcibly dragged her to his house where he removed his own clothes as well as the victim clothes and committed sexual intercourse with her without her will and thereafter, he locked her i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
