SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 4966

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
GOKUL RAM SAHU – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WPC/694/2026



2026:CGHC:8436 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 694 of 2026 Gokul Ram Sahu S/o Late Johan Ram Aged About 75 Years Village- Lakhanpuri, Tehsil- Charama, District- North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.)

... Petitioner versus

1 - Union Of India Through- Deputy Secretary, Ministry Of Consumer Affairs, Food And Public Distribution Department Of Food And Public Distribution, Krishi Bhawan New Delhi

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.)

3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)

4 - C.G. State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Kanker, District- Kanker (C.G.)

5 - Collector (Food Department) Kanker, District- Kanker (C.G.)

6 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.)

7 - Food Corporation Of India (Fci) Regional Office- Mova, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

8 - Union Bank Of India Through Branch Manager, Branch Office Kanker, District-

Kanker (C.G.)

9 - Bank Of Maharashtra Through Branch Manager, Branch Office Kanker, District-

Kanker (C.G.)

... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advocate For Respondent No.1/UOI : Mr. Rishabh Dev Singh, Adv. on behalf of Mr.

RK Mishra, Dy. SGI For Respondents 2&5/ State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Digitally

signed by BINI

BINI PRADEEP

PRADEEP D 20 a 2 te 6 : .02.18

+0530

For Respondents 3 & 6 : Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate
For Respondent No.7 : Mr. RS Patel, Advocate
For Respondent No.8 : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Sharad Mishra, Advocate
For Respondent No.9 : Mr. Anumeh Shrivastava, Adv. through VC and Mr. Jayed Ziya Ali, Advocate
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

Order on Board

17.02.2026

1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:-

“10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concerned respondent to accept the balance of FCI Arwa custom milled rice (CMR) of 1510.028 quintals of Kharif year KMS 2023-24) which the petitioner has always been ready and willing to deposit and the petitioner be allowed to pay the shortage found in Physical Verification amounting to 6013.652 quintals of Custom Milling Rice through Bill.

10.2 That Hon'ble Court may further direct the concerned respondents not to take any type of action against the petitioner's firm with regard to recovery of amount of balance CMR from the FDR/ Bank guarantee/PDC given by the petitioner as security against the agreement of custom milling of rice for year 2023-24 as the petitioner has already given consent for recovery of 6013.652 quintals of Custom Milling Rice through Bill which was found short in Physical Verification.

10.3 That this Hon'ble Court May kindly be pleased to direct the respondent concerned to grant stake in favor of the petitioner and may direct the NIC to open the wing (ID) (if not already opened), FCI portal so that remaining amount of CMR i.e. 1510.028 quintals of FCI Arwa custom milled rice of KMS

2023-24 can be deposited efficiently.

10.4 That, the Hon'ble may kindly be pleased to direct respondent no. 6 to modify the quantity of Shortage in CMR from 7523.68 quintals to 6013.652 quintals for KMS 2023-24 with respect to petitioner as 6013.652 quintals was the actual shortage which was found in Physical Verification.

10.5 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s)/ writ(s), order(s) in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon'ble Court deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.

10.6 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s)/ writ(s), order(s) in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon'ble Court deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. Learned counsel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top