SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 4982

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAMASHISH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPS/834/2020



2026:CGHC:8454 AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 834 of 2020

1 - Ramashish Singh S/o Late Bhagirathi Singh, Aged About 61 Years, And 11 Months, R/o Kedarpur, Near Pahuna Shop, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee Chhattisgarh Raipur, Through Its President, High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh., 3 - High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee Chhattisgarh Raipur, Through Its Secretary, High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Chhattisgarh Raipur Chhattisgarh., 4 - Commissioner Tribal Welfare Block 4d, Ground Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh., 5 - Member Secretary Cum Director High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Chhattisgarh Raipur Chhattisgarh., 6 - Commissioner Surguja Division, Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Sr. Advocate with Shri Kabir Kalwani, Advocate.

Digitally signed by KRISHNA KRISHNA KUMAR KUMAR BARVE BARVE Date:

2026.02.19 +0530 For : Shri Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate.

Respondent(s)

Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board

17/02/2026 :

Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the

1.

Constitution of India, the petitioner herein seeks to challenge the legality, validity and correctness of the order dated 7.9.2019 (Annexure-P/1) by which the petitioner’s caste has been revoked by the High Power Certification Scrutiny Committee under Section 7 of the Chhattisgarh Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes & Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Social Status Certification) Act, 2013 (henceforth ‘the Act, 2013’).

The aforesaid challenge has been made on the following

2.

factual backdrop.

The petitioner was appointed on the post of Second Grade

3.

Clerk by the Collector, Surguja, vide order dated 18.1.1982 and thereafter he was promoted on the post of Assistant Grade-II. The petitioner was further promoted on the post of Auditor and vide order dated 22.3.2018, he was promoted on the post of Superintendent, Land Records. During his tenure, a caste certificate was issued in favour of the petitioner stating that he belongs to ‘Gond’ community. The said certificate was verified by the District Level Certificates Verification Committee under Section 6 of the Act, 2013. The said Committee issued a certificate (Annexure-P/8) stating that the petitioner belongs to the ST community, after due enquiry under Section 6 of the Act, 2013. However, the said Committee did not refer the matter to the High Power Certification Scrutiny Committee for further scrutiny. The information concerning the social status of the petitioner was communicated to the Deputy Commissioner, office of Commissioner, vide letter dated 12.7.2017 stating that the verification certificate has been issued on 17.7.2014. As such, the certificate dated 17.7.2014 on the basis of social status certificate dated 6.6.2014 has attained finality. In the meanwhile, during the pendency of said enquiry before the District Level Certificates Verification Committee, one Kunj Bihari Singh Paikra, President, Sarv Adivasi Samaj, Surguja made a complaint to the Commissioner, Surguja Division that the petitioner is not a member of the ST community, as he has obtained the said certificate by means of fraud and is getting the benefit of reservation, on the basis of which the Commissioner has got it enquired from the Collector and issued a memo on 24th March, 2014 to the High Power Certification Scrutiny Committee for enquiry regarding the caste of the petitioner. Accordingly, an enquiry was conducted and on 7.9.2019 an order has been passed holding that the petitioner is not a member of the ST Community and the certificates date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top