IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Rahul Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Limited And Ors. – Respondent
WPC/2074/2014
##PAGE1##
1
2026:CGHC:6660
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 2074 of 2014
Rahul Bhardwaj S/o Shri Mahadev Bhardwaj Aged About 25 Years R/o Village
And Post Birra, Ps Birra, Tah Champa, Dist Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
versus
1 - Indian Oil Corporation Limited , A Registered Company, Registered Office
At G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai 400051, Branch Office At
Indian Oil Bhawan, Divisional Office, Vip Road, Raipur, Telibandha, Ps
Telibandha, Dist Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2 - The Sale Officer, L.P.G. Raigarh, Vitaran Kendra, Raigarh, District :
Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
3 - The Chief Area Manager Indian Oil Corporation, Rajeev Gandhi Road,
Telibandha, Po Ravigram, Dist Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4 - The Collector Janjgir Champa, Distt Janjgir Champa, Cg, District : Janjgir-
Champa, Chhattisgarh.
5 - D.S.Kanwar Posted As Naib Tahsildar, Bamhnidih, Distt Janjgir Champa,
District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.
6 - Hanuman Prasad Dewangan Posted As Revenue Inspector, Bamhanidih,
Distt Janjgir Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.
##PAGE2##2
7 - Chandrakumar Tiwari Aged About 27 Years Poste4d As Patwari,
P.H.No.27, Tah Bamhanidih, Distt Janjgir Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa,
Chhattisgarh.
8 - Sahas Ram Kurre R/o Vill Ameradih, Tah Malkharoda, Distt Janjgir
Champa, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. H. S. Patel, Advocate
For Res. Nos. 1, 2 &: Mr. Parth Shrivastava, Advocate
3
For Res. No. 4 : Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Additional Advocate General
For Res. No. 5 to 7 : None, despite service
For Res. No. 8 : Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh and Mr. K. K. Dewangan,
Advocates
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Order On Board
05/02/2026
1.
Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has
been preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs :-
“10.1. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-
aside/quash the impugned orders dated 03.03.2014 and
02.09.2014(AnnexureP/1) and further be pleased to direct the
respondent authorities to award Distributorship of RGGLV of
Location No. 6 Birra.
10.2 To kindly grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the
given facts and circumstances of the instant case.
10.3 That, this Hon’able Court may kindly be pleased to set-
aside/quash the impugned letter of appointment issued
respondent Indian Oil Corporation for Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG
Vitrak(RGGLV) at Birra in favour of respondent Sahas Ram
Kurre on 05.11.2015(AnnexureP/20).”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No. 1-
Indian Oil Corporation Limited invited applications for appointment of Liquid
Petroleum Gas (LPG) Distributor under Rajiv Gandhi Gramin LPG Distribution
##PAGE3##3
Scheme in the State of Chhattisgarh, for which, an advertisement was
published in daily newspaper “Nav-Bharat on 18th of May, 2013. The
advertisement for appointment of the LPG dealer was also published in
respect of village Birra Tahshil Bamnhidih, District Janjgir-Champa. Various
conditions and eligibility criteria was also mentioned in the said advertisement.
One of the conditions for eligible candidate for making an application in lieu of
the advertisement is that candidate should be the resident of the said village
and having the land with the requisite dimension as mentioned in the
advertisement. It is submitted that the applicants, who are permanent resident
of the village, shall be given preference in appointment of LPC Distributorship.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner and the
respondent No. 8 submitted their applications in lieu of the advertisement. The
petitioner also in detailed disclosed about the land held by him in village Birra.
The petitioner also submitted the necessary documents, which were required
in the said advertisement. Initially, the petitioner was shown to be a successful
candidate by the respondent, however, the candidature of the petitioner was
subsequently rejected inter alia giving the reason that the land held
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.