V PADMAVATHI Date: 2026.01.24 11:09:05 +0530

2026:CGHC:381 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1448 of 2025 Deniyal Tandi S/o Rabin Tandi Aged About 46 Years R/o Housing Board Colony, Boriyakal, Thana Mujgahan District Raipur (C.G.)

... Applicant(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Police Station Gudiyari Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2 - X (Name And Address Of The Victim/complainant Is Given In Closed Envelope)

... Respondent (s)

(Cause title is taken from the CIS)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Applicant : Shri Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Aman Tamboli, PL For Respondent- 2 : Shri Anmol Sharma, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Order on Board

05.01.2026

1. Pursuant to order dated 02.12.2025, victim and her sister appeared through virtual mode from the DLSA concerned, and she has also been represented through her counsel Anmol Sharma, and raised objection in granting bail to the applicant. Their objection has been taken on record.

2. The petitioner has filed the present Criminal Revision against the order dated 06.10.2025, passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge/2nd FTC, Special Judge (POCSO), Raipur, District-Raipur CG in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case 201 of 2025, whereby the the learned trial Court has framed charges against the applicant for the offences under Sections376(D), 294, 506 Part-II of the IPC, and Sections 4(1), 5G/6 of the POCSO Act.

3. Subject matter in brief in the case is that the applicant is an accused in the offence of Crime No. 288 of 2025 registered at Police Station Gudiyari, District-Raipur for the offence under sections 376(1), 376(2)(D), 294 and 506 of the IPC and Sections 4, 6 & 10 of the POCSO Act.

4. The above said crime numbers were registered on 02.06.2025 on a report made by Respondent 2, who is the victim in the case, that on 13.02.2024, she had gone to the clinic of one Dhanesh at about 8.00 am, and when she was returning from the clinic, present applicant met her and on his instance when she had gone to back side of the clinic, present applicant also came there and after closing the door he committed rape upon her and prepared the obscene video of rape. He threatened her that if she disclose the incident to anyone, he would get the video viral in social media and she would be defamed. Due to fear she could not disclose the incident but whenever the present applicant met her on the way he called her in the clinic of Dhanesh and repeatedly committed forceful sexual intercourse and prepared obscene videos. On 24.05.2025 also when the victim was going to her sister’s house at Gudiyari, on the way present applicant threatened her and then she disclosed the incident to her family members and lodged the report. FIR has been registered against the applicant and one co-accused Anil Kumar Verma.

5. Statements of the witnesses have been recorded and after completion of the investigation charge-sheet was filed before the learned trial court against the applicant and the co-accused Anil Kumar Verma, in which charges have been framed by the learned trial court, which is under challenge in the present criminal revision.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that victim has lodged report on 02.06.2025 with respect to the incident of rape that allegedly committed on 13.02.2024, that too after acquittal of brother of the victim, who was an accused in the offence of crime no. 26 of 2025 registered at police station Sarswati nagar, Raipur, for the offence under Sections 363, 366, 376 (2) (n), and 506/34 of the IPC, and Sections 4 & 6 of the POCSO Act. Just after judgment of acquittal of her brother passed on 29.05.2025, she lodged a report on 02.06.2025. In the case against brother of the victim, wife of the present applicant was complain