IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
JAGMOHAN (Died) Through Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
INDRA KANWAR (Dead ) Though Lrs. – Respondent
SA/139/2006
##PAGE1##
1
2025:CGHC:61970
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Reserved for Judgment on : 13.10.2025
Judgment Delivered on : 23/12/2025
Judgment Uploaded on : 23/12/2025
SA No. 139 of 2006
1 - Jagmohan (Died) Through Lrs. As Per Honble Court Order Dated 16-09-
2019.
1.(A). Ramnarayan S/o Late Jagmohan Aged About 38 Years
1.(B). Dhankunwar Wd/o Late Jagmohan Aged About 75 Years
Both are R/o Village Pipara, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.,
2 - Gedibai (Dead ) Through Lrs., As Per Court Order Dt. 16-12-2019.
2. (A) Basant (Died And Deleted) As Per Honble Court Order Dated 07-11-
2024.
2.(B) Santosh S/o Bandhu Ram Aged About 53 Years
2.-(C) Shankar Lal S/o Bandhu Ram Aged About 55 Years
All are R/o Village Karji, Post Office Patna, Police Station And Tahsil Patna,
District - Koriya Chhattisgarh.
3 - Nirasobai D/o Arjun Aged About 47 Years Caste Rajwar, R/o Village Cher,
Tahsil Baikunthpur District Koriya Chhattisgarh.
4 - Kismatiya Bai D/o Arjun Aged About 42 Years Caste Rajwar, Occupation
House Wife R/o Village Kharwat, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya
Chhattisgarh. .
--- Appellants/Plaintiffs
versus
1 - Indra Kanwar (Dead ) Though Lrs., As Per Court Order Dt. 29-07-2019.
Digitally
signed by
BALRAM
BALRAM PRASAD
PRASAD DEWANGAN
DEWANGANDate: 1.(A) Jugeshwar S/o Sundarsay Aged About 25 Years Occupation -
2025.12.23
1 +3 0: 55 39 0:11 Cultivator, Caste - Rajwar, R/o Village Kudhari , Police Station And Tahsil -
##PAGE2##2
Bhaiyathan, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur),
Chhattisgarh
2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Koriay Chhattisgarh.
--- Respondents/Defendants
(Cause title is taken from CIS)
____________________________________________________________
For Appellant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate
For Respondent No.1 (A) : None present
For Respondent No.2/State : Mr. Ajay Kumrahi, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
CAV Judgment
1. This is second call of the case, first in pre-lunch session and second in
post lunch session. There is no representation on behalf of private
respondent. Order sheet of the appeal would show that earlier Mr.
Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate is causing appearance on behalf
of respondent No.1(A). He filed Vakalatnama on 25.10.2024 for
respondent No.1(A). On 15.09.2025 Mr. Utkarsh Patel, Advocate
appeared on behalf of Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel and prays for time
and case was adjourned for its listing in the month of October. On
06.10.2025, there was no representation on behalf of respondent No.1
A, however, the case was adjourned on the request of the learned
counsel for appellant. Today also there is no representation on behalf
of respondent No.1(A).
2. This appeal is received in remand from Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its
order dated 05.09.2023 with a direction to dispose of this second
appeal expeditiously preferably within a period of six months. In the
aforementioned facts of the case, this appeal is heard in absence of
the counsel for respondent No.1(A).
##PAGE3##3
3. This second appeal U/s.100 of C.P.C. is filed by appellant/plaintiffs
No.1 questioning legality and sustainability of the impugned judgment
and decree dated 17.01.2006, passed in Civil Appeal No.5-A/2004,
whereby, learned Additional District Judge, Baikunthpur, District-
Koriya (C.G.) arising out of the judgment and decree dated
23.10.2003, in Civil Suit No.6-A/1995, whereby learned Civil Judge
Class-1, Baikunthpur, District – Koriya dismissed the suit filed by the
plaintiffs.
4. For the sake of convenience, parties will be referred to as per their
respective status before the trial Court.
5. Facts relevant for disposal of this appeal are that appellants/plaintiffs
filed a civil suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction against
the respondents/defendants with regard to the suit land and property
mentioned in Schedule ‘A’ of the plaint. It was pleaded that the suit
property was originally held by one Arjun, he had two sons i.e. plaintiff
No.1 Jagmohan and Baban Ram. Widow of Baban Ram is defendant
No.1. Plaintiff No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.