SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 16118

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SMT. HEM PUSHPA – Appellant
Versus
ARJUN RAM – Respondent
FA(MAT)/295/2024



2025:CGHC:61133-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 295 of 2024

1 - Smt. Hem Pushpa W/o Arjun Ram Aged About 28 Years Caste Satnami, Occupation- Service- (Anganbadi Woker) R/o. Village Alola, Police Station Kapu, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). At Present R/o Village- Majhapara, Police Station Kapu, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.).

... Appellant versus

1 - Arjun Ram S/o Shri Anuj Ram Aged About 34 Years Caste Satnami Occupation- Service- (Junior Technician Electrical, Medical College Raigarh) Permanent R/o Village Alola, Police Station Kapu, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.). At Present R/o Type 5, Quarter No. 107, Medical College Campus Raigarh, Tehsil And , District- Raigarh (C.G.).

... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Abhishek Saraf, Advocate.

For Respondent : Ms. Vidhi Matlani, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate.

DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswa l

Order on Board

(16.12.2025)

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

Digitally signed by HEERAHEERA LAL LAL SAHU

Date:

SAHU 2025.12.17

+0530

1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 05.08.2024 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Raigarh (C.G.) in Civil Suit No. 11-A/2022, whereby the application under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the respondent herein has been decreed.

2. The marriage between the parties took place on 12.05.2017 as per Hindu Law and Customs in village Majhapara, Tehsil Dharamjaigarh, District – Raigarh (C.G.), thereafter they could not continue with the marital relationship, and eventually an application was preferred by the respondent herein under Section 10 of Hindu Marriage Act for granting a decree of judicial separation was allowed by the learned family Court.

3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter was referred to the mediation center of this Court, and the mediation has been successfully completed. The parties have arrived at a compromise on 22.09.2025, on certain terms and conditions, and have filed an application (I.A. No. 01/2025) under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act for grant of mutual divorce, along with an application (I.A. No. 02/2025) to waive the cooling-off period of six months. It is further submitted that, as per the settlement, the respondent herein has already paid an amount of Rs.4,75,000/- to the appellant/wife, which she admits to have received.

4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the application under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

5. It is not in dispute that the parties are living separately since 10.06.2020 and the chances of reconciliation do not exist. The application under section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act has been filed before this Court on 07.10.2025 along with the application to waive the cooling- off period of six months which is supported by an affidavit. In this context, the text of Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act would be relevant here and quoted below:

13-B. Divorce by mutual consent.-- (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the period is not withdrawn in the meantime, the Court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top