IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
PURAN SAO (Died) Through Lrs – Appellant
Versus
Bullu (Died) Through Lrs. – Respondent
SA/8/2005
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 8 of 2005 PURAN SAO versus Bullu (Died) Through Lrs.
Order sheet On due consideration, the applications (I.A. Nos. 4, 5 and 6 of 2025) are allowed. The delay in filing the setting aside abatement application is condoned and abatement is set aside. Consequently, the appellants are permitted to substitute the names of proposed legal representatives of the deceased/appellant No.1 in the cause title of the appeal memo.
Also heard on I.A. No. 10 of 2025, which is an application for deletion of name of the appellant No.5-
Jhalkhi.
Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that, the appellant No.5- Jhalkhi has died on 15.01.2025 and her legal representative is already on record as the appellant No.4, therefore, the name of appellant No.5 may be deleted from the cause title of the memo of appeal.
On due consideration, the application (I.A. No. 10 of
2025) is allowed.
Learned counsel for the appellants is permitted to delete the name of appellant No.5 from the cause title of the memo of appeal.
Also heard on I.A. No. 7 of 2025, which is an application for deletion of name of respondent No. 1(a)- Suni and I.A. No. 9 of 2025, which is an application for deletion of name of respondent No.5- Kismatiya @ Kubri.
Learned counsel for the appellants would further
ved
List this case after service of notice upon the proposed legal representatives of deceased/respondent No.2. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.