SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 16740

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
PARAG CHELWANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
CRMP/3748/2025



2025:CGHC:60196-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3748 of 2025

1.

Parag Chelwani S/o Chandarlal Totaldas Chelwani Aged About 36 Years R/o Plot No. 18, Sindhu Nagar Society, Jaripatka, Nagpur, M.H.

2.

Chandarlal Totaldas Chelwani S/o Lt. Totaldas Chelwani Aged About 62 Years R/o Plot No. 18, Sindhu Nagar Society, Jaripatka, Nagpur, M.H.

3.

Maya Chelwani W/o Chandarlal Totaldas Chelwani Aged About 56 Years R/o Plot No. 18, Sindhu Nagar Society, Jaripatka, Nagpur, M.H.

4.

Riya Anandani W/o Vijay Anandani Aged About 32 Years R/o Maninagar, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, Currently At - 1419, Boone Rd Se Salem, Or 97306, USA

5.

Vijay Anandani S/o Ashok Anandani Aged About 33 Years R/o Maninagar, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, Currently At - 1419, Boone Rd Se Salem, Or 97306, USA ... Petitioner(s)

versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through Ps Mahila Thana, District- Raipur (C.G.)

2.

Shweta Chelwani W/o Parag Chelwani Aged About 34 Years R/o Through Father Lt. Shyam Khattar, Rajiv Nagar, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.)

...Respondent(s)

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

For Petitioners : Mr. Vinay Nagdev, Advocate through Digitally video conferencing.

signed by BRIJMOHAN BRIJMOHAN MORLE For Respondent/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer.

MORLE Date:

2025.12.11

18:51:22 For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Prakhar Dutt, Advocate.

+0530 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge

Order on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

11/12 / 202 5

1.

Heard Mr. Vinay Nagdev, learned counsel for the petitioners through video conferencing. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for State/respondent No. 1 and Mr. Prakhar Dutt, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 2.

2.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the impugned FIR No. 113/23 dated 09.09.2023 registered by PS Mahila Thana District Raipur (C.G.) for offences under Section 498A, 34, 377 of the IPC against all the petitioners, and further for quashing the charge-sheet bearing Number 85/24 dated 15.08.2024 under Section 498A, 34 and 377 of the IPC, the order taking cognizance dated 21.11.2024 and the criminal proceedings pending before the Court of learned JMFC, Raipur, in Criminal Case No. 19638/24 in case titled as State of CG vs Parag Chelwani & Ors.

3.

Today, when the matter was called, Mr. Vinay Nagdev, learned counsel, appeared before this Court through video conferencing on behalf of the petitioners. However, a perusal of the memo of appearance filed on 04.12.2025 by Mr. Vinay Nagdev along with Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, Mr. Durlabh Kumar Agrawal, Mr. Akash Mishra, Mr. Girish Sahu, Mr. Faiz Kazi and Mr. Lukesh Kumar Mishra, Advocates, reveals that it does not bear the signatures of the petitioners nor is there any signature of the person who has authorised the counsel to file the present petition on their behalf.

4.

It is stated that petitioners No. 4 and 5 are presently residing abroad as on date. In view of this defect, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with a properly authorized memo of appearance/Vakalatnama of the petitioners.

5.

In light of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition, subject to the payment of costs of Rs. 5,000/- for having filed the petition in a casual manner and thereby wasting the valuable time of the Court. The said amount shall be deposited by the petitioners before the Registry of this Court, and the receipt shall be produced at the time of filing any fresh petition. The amount so deposited shall be transmitted to the Government Disabled College, Mana Camp, Raipur.

6.

Certified copies of the documents annexed to the petition, if any, may be returned to the counsel for the petitioners after retaining photocopies thereof.

7.

Before parting with the case, this Court deems it appropriate t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top