SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 18334

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
JITENDRA SAY PAIKRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


2025:CGHC:57705-DB Digitally s JY ig O n T e I d by NAFR JYOTI SHARMA SHARMADate:

2025.11.28

10:17:35 +0530 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 2257 of 2024 Jitendra Say Paikra S/o Mahaveer Say Aged About 19 Years R/o Purainbandha, Police Station- Tapkara, District- Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s)

versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station- Tapkara, District- Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s)

For Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, Advocates.

For Respondent(s) : Ms. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

27.11.2025 By order dated 05.03.2025, this Court directed the State counsel to inform the father of victim (PW2) regarding pendency of the appeal revealing that he can appear on the date fixed and object the prayer made by the appellant.

Today, learned State counsel would submit that since the father of the victim expired, the intimation regarding pendency of the appeal has been given to the victim Despite the above, no representation is made on behalf of the victim to object the prayer.

1. This criminal appeal prefer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top