SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 18486

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ABHISHEK DAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
CRA/1696/2024



HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 1656 of 2024 RAVI KHANDEKAR versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Digitally BABLU signed by RAJENDRA BABLU BHANARKAR RAJENDRA CRA/1954/2024,CRA/1696/2024 BHANARKAR Order Sheet of the Juvenile Justice Act for determination of his age. After holding an inquiry, learned trial Court referred the matter to the Juvenile Justice Board, Bilaspur on 29.07.2022. Upon conducting the inquiry, the Juvenile Justice Board, Bilaspur, determined that the appellant was over 18 years of age at the time of the incident and sent the matter back to the concerned trial Court on 10.07.2023. Thereafter, the learned trial Court framed charges against the appellant on 12.07.2023. He further submits that during the inquiry for determination of the appellant’s age, other accused, Abishek Dan and Sahil @ Shibu, had already been facing trial before the trial Court, and P.W.-1 to P.W.-9 had been examined. However, after framing of charges against the present appellant, only P.W.-1 (Asif Mohammad) and P.W.-6 (Sheikh Alam) were examined. The remaining witnesses, namely P.W.-2, P.W.-3, P.W.-4, P.W.-5, P.W.- 7, P.W.-8, and P.W.-9 were not examined after framing of charges. Therefore, the statements of these witnesses cannot legally be relied upon against the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top