SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 18536

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Naresh Kumar Chandravanni, J
Hemant Gaur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA No. 1688 of 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Kiran Jain, Abhishek Sharma
For the Respondents: Shailesh Kumar Puriya

In NDPS cases, the prosecution must prove an unbroken, unimpeachable chain of custody of the seized contraband from recovery to the forensic lab; failure to produce the Malkhana register or examine the custodian creates a fatal gap in evidence, necessitating an acquittal.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - S. 20(b)(ii)

(C), S. 42, S. 52-A, S. 57 - Conviction for illegal transportation of Ganja - Link evidence regarding safe custody of contraband - Importance of Malkhana register and examination of Malkhana In-charge - Prosecution must prove unbroken and unimpeachable chain of custody from recovery to FSL analysis - Non-compliance with mandatory procedural provisions and failure to establish safe custody creates serious doubt resulting in acquittal. (Paras 21-25, 31)

Facts of the case:
Appellants were convicted for transporting 75.650 kg of Ganja. The search and seizure were conducted by police officers; however, major discrepancies arose regarding the safe custody of the seized contraband. The Malkhana register was not produced, the Malkhana In-charge was not examined, and there was a substantial delay and lack of evidence regarding the chain of custody of samples sent to the FSL.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that the prosecution failed to prove the chain of custody beyond reasonable doubt. The non-production of the Malkhana register and the failure to examine the custodial officer raised serious doubts about the integrity of the seized samples. Consequently, the FSL report lacked evidentiary value, and the trial court's judgment was perverse.

Issues: Whether the prosecution successfully established the chain of custody for the seized contraband and complied with mandatory procedural requirements under the NDPS Act.

Ratio Decidendi: In cases under the NDPS Act, the prosecution is strictly bound to prove the unbroken and unimpeachable chain of custody of the contraband. Failure to produce the Malkhana register or examine the custodian creates gaps that entitle the accused to the benefit of doubt.

Result: Appeal allowed. Accused acquitted.

Table of Content
1. summary of prosecution case and conviction details under ndps act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. appellants contend failure to maintain chain of custody and procedural lapses. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court scrutinizes evidence, internal contradictions, and failure to prove malkhana records. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. absence of unbroken custody and procedural flaws renders fsl evidence unreliable. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
5. final acquittal based on failure to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 33 , 34 , 35)

{Cause title, as taken from Case Information System}

CAV Judgment

1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants under Section 374 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.07.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, NDPS Act, Kondagaon, District Kondagaon in Special Criminal Case (NDPS Act) No. 04/2018 whereby appellants have been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (henceforth, 'NDPS Act') and sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with fine of Rs.1,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for one year.

2. Case of the prosecution in brief, is that on 03.12.2017, at about 9.10 AM, Inspector Sharad Dubey (PW-7) of Police Station Keshkal received secret information from informant that a White Tavera vehicle bearing registration No. MP 04 BC-0156 is transporting contraband substance Ganja from Jagdalpur to Raipur unauthorizedly, for sale. The said secret information was recorded in rojnamcha sanha. Two independent witnesses were called. Necessary Rojnamcha Sanhas and Mukbir suchna panchnama were prepared. Above information was sent to Sub Divisional Officer (P), Keshkal. Subsequently, police party proceeded towards the place of occurrence and cordoned off at Vishrampuri Triangle, Main Road N.H. 30 Keshkal, District Kondagaon. After reaching there, aforesaid Tavera vehicle was stopped and the persons, who were occupants of the Tavera, have informed their names as Hemant Gaur (appellant No. 1 herein), who was driving the aforesaid vehicle and Vishal shivhare (appellant No.2), who was sitting in the middle seat. Notice under Section 50 of NDPS Act was served to the respondents/accused. Necessary Panchnamas were prepared. After preparing necessary Panchnamas, they searched the aforesaid vehicle and found 14 packets wrapped in Brown sellotape kept under the rear seat of the said vehicle, which was recovered vide Ex.P-6. The said contraband substance was identified as Ganja by smelling, to which identification Panchnama (Ex.P-7) was prepared. After weighing the 14 packets of recovered contraband substance Ganja, the total weight was found to be 75.650 kg. Thereafter, search of accused/appellant was started, in which, a Jivani company mobile, Aadhar card, two ATM cards were found, thereafter, a suspicions search panchnama was prepared and notice under Section 67 of NDPS Act was given to the appellant, but he failed to produce any valid document for its transportation. Necessary Panchnamas were prepared and at the place of occurrence, unnumbered Dahati Nalishi (Ex.P-34) was registered under Section 20 (b) of the NDPS Act. Based on which, FIR was registered against the appellants. Seized / recovered contraband substance and articles were deposited in Malkhana of the concerned police station and receipt thereof was obtained. Statement of the witnesses were recorded. Spot map were prepared by the Police and the Patwari. The recovered contraband was homogenized, inventory and sampling were prepared by Executive Magistrate, which was also photographed. One sample marked as “S-1” of seized contraband was sent to FSL, Raipur, to which vide its report Ex. 43-A, the FSL reported that sample S-1 is Ganja.

3. After comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top