SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 18939

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ
Chanakya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA No. 1834 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Hemant Kumar Sahu, Syed Afaque Jhussain Rizvi
For the Respondents: Smriti Shrivastava

Section 397 of the IPC requires that the offender must have either used a deadly weapon or caused grievous hurt during a robbery; simple injuries inflicted with an ordinary kitchen knife do not fulfill the essential ingredients of Section 397.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 394 and 397 - Robbery - Use of deadly weapon - Necessity of proving grievous hurt or effective use of weapon to invoke Section 397 - Conviction upheld under Section 394 but set aside under Section 397 due to lack of evidence regarding grievous injury or intent to cause death or grievous hurt. (Paras 18-20)

(B) Appellate Court - Criminal Appeal - Sentence reduction - Appellant having undergone substantial portion of sentence (over 4 years) and no prior criminal antecedents - Sentence reduced to period already undergone. (Paras 21-22) Facts of the Case: The appellant was convicted for robbery of a truck after forcing the driver out at knifepoint. The driver sustained a minor incised wound on his palm. The trial court convicted the appellant under Sections 394 and 397 IPC. The appellant appealed, challenging the identification and the finding that the knife used constituted a deadly weapon sufficient to invoke Section 397.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 394 but set aside the conviction under Section 397, noting the injury was simple in nature and the weapon was not proven to be used in a manner intended to cause death or grievous hurt.

Issues: Whether the conviction under Section 397 IPC was sustainable given the minor nature of the injury and the lack of evidence of usage of a deadly weapon for grievous harm.

Ratio Decidendi: The term 'uses' in Section 397 IPC implies an effective use of the weapon to cause imminent fear of death or grievous hurt; since the medical evidence established only a simple injury and the specific nature of the knife did not meet the high threshold for 'deadly weapon' in this context, the conviction under Section 397 was unsustainable.

Result: Appeal partly allowed; conviction under Section 394 affirmed, conviction under Section 397 set aside, and sentence reduced.

Table of Content
1. overview of trial court proceedings and evidence regarding the robbery. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. contentions regarding evidence, identification, and sentence severity. (Para 7 , 8)
3. appreciation of evidence and affirmation of conviction under section 394 ipc. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. analysis of section 397 ipc requirements and lack of proof for grievous hurt. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. modification of sentence based on period already undergone. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20.10.2022 passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Raigarh, District – Raigarh (C.G.) passed in Session Trial No.12/2022, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced in following manner :-

CONVICTION SENTENCE
Under Section 394/397 of the Indian Penal Code RI for 7 years and fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for 06 months.

2. Case of the prosecution is that on 28.08.2021, the complainant Sukhdev Singh (P.W.-01), driver of a looted Hyva truck, was transporting the vehicle from Chandrapur to D.B. Power Plant, Tundri. Due to a no-entry restriction in Raigarh city, he parked the vehicle near Patelpali at around 08:00 PM and remained inside the cabin. At approximately 10:30 PM, the accused Chanakya Sharma climbed into the cabin, threatened the complainant with a knife, and ordered him to drive the vehicle in the direction instructed by him. After they had travelled some distance, the accused asked him to stop the truck and stated that he would drive it himself. A scuffle ensued inside the cabin, during which the accused disclosed his name as Chanakya Sharma, resident of Kodatarai, and threatened the complainant saying that he must hand over the Hyva truck, otherwise he would kill him with the knife. The accused then assaulted the complainant with the knife, causing an injury on the left palm/thumb. Fearing for his life, the complainant jumped out of the truck near Patelpali Mandi and escaped. The accused thereafter fled with the Hyva truck valued at approximately Rs.10 lakhs.

3. The complainant lodged a written report at Police Outpost Jute Mill at 12:15 AM on 29.08.2021, naming the accused. Based on this report, Sub-Inspector Girdhari Sahu (P.W.-08) registered a zero FIR under Section 394 IPC, and subsequently at 1:40 AM the regular FIR bearing Crime No. 1220/2021 was registered by Sub-Inspector Ravishankar Pandey. On 29.08.2021, the complainant’s statement was recorded and the site map (Ex. P-04) was prepared as per the indications of the complainant and witnesses. The complainant underwent a medical examination at District Hospital, Raigarh, where Dr. Arun Kumar Patel (A.S.-05), in the MLC report (Ex. P-05), noted a 1 cm incised wound on the complainant’s left hand. The accused was apprehended the same day at 3:15 PM, and the truck and knife were seized from him (Ex. P-07). The documents relating to the vehicle were seized from the complainant at 4:10 PM (Ex. P-08). The accused was arrested at 10:25 PM (Ex. P-09) and information was given to his relative, Vishakha Sharma. The seized knife was sent for expert medical opinion, and Dr. Arun Kumar Patel opined that the injury sustained by the complainant could have been caused by the said knife. Statements of witnesses Dharmendra Sharma and Shyam Narayan Sahu were recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C..

4. Upon completion of investigation and finding sufficient material, a charge-sheet under Section 394 IPC was filed against the accused Chanakya @ Dilip Sharma under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raigarh. The Trial Court, on 11.10.2021, framed a charge against the accused under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and fixed the matter for recording evidence. During the stage of prosecution evidence, an application under Section 209 read with Section 323 of the Code o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top